<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>No need for latent typing in C#</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/beatsch/archive/2004/03/13/89112.aspx</link><description>To follow up on my recent post , I came to the conclusion that I&amp;#8217;m definitely not missing latent typing ! At the end, the question is whether you want to have tightly or loosely coupled implementations. IMHO coupling at the level of a programming</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator></channel></rss>