<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx</link><description>I want to appologize for the problems people have experienced with strong name signing and the updated MSSCCI provider. We should not have posted it with a manual work around of disabling strong name signing for the test key. Although many developers</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#536926</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:04:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:536926</guid><dc:creator>Leea</dc:creator><description>Personally I would like to see a very short cycle for the second release so that you can fix any post V1 issues that inevitably happen plus getting all them dropped features in. This would also give users the opportunity to explore using the product(s) in *real* world situations….Then I would have thought you would get better feedback based on real experience in the field so to speak.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Regards&lt;br&gt;Lee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S Congrulations on nearly getting there :-)</description></item><item><title>VSTS Links - 2/23/2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#537878</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:15:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:537878</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>John Lawrence posts their Team Foundation Dogfood Statistics for February.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's Rob Caron time:&lt;br&gt;...</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#544717</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 23:02:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:544717</guid><dc:creator>Vaughn Hughes</dc:creator><description>It's great that it's up and working with Visual Studio 2003 and 6, however... I am stlil completely shocked that 1) the recently-released SQL Server Management Studio has no integration with TFS whatsoever, and 2) this MSSCCI provider does not work with it, even though it apparently supports MSSCCI providers in the Tools | Options menu. Are you guys actively working on enabling this?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#544741</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2006 23:34:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:544741</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>We are investigating getting TFS working with SQL Management Studio. &amp;nbsp;I believe we will get one or the other (Team Explorer or MSSCCI plug-in) to work. &amp;nbsp;I'll try to post something in the next few weeks with an update.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brian</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#557680</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:44:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:557680</guid><dc:creator>Igor Svetlanov</dc:creator><description>I have the following problem: In VS 2003 when a file is checked out using MSSCCI provider, a local copy is left on the disk. Can I configure the provider so that it will get the latest version when performing check out as it is done by the SourceSafe?</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#557860</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:29:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:557860</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>In short no. &amp;nbsp;This is how TFS works - it checks out the version that you have and doesn't get a new version when you check out. &amp;nbsp;We've recieved feedback that not everyone wants to work this way so we are investigating adding an option to get the latest version on checkout in our next version.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's one scenario in which checkout will do a get. &amp;nbsp;That's if you have never gotten the file at all (for example if someone just added it). &amp;nbsp;If you try to check it out then, we'll get the latest version of it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brian</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#557863</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:34:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:557863</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>I wanted to give an update on SQL Server Management Studio support. &amp;nbsp;We've fixed the problem that was preventing the MSSCCI provider from loading in SSMS. &amp;nbsp;When we release the next rev of the MSSCCI provided (that works with the TFS RTM version), SSMS integration will work. &amp;nbsp;In addition, we've gotten the MSSCCI provider working with MS Access.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the next few days I'll try to post a new blog entry about the MSSCCI provider giving an expected timeframe for the next drop and the list of IDEs we've tested it with.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brian</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#559384</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:41:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:559384</guid><dc:creator>dazim</dc:creator><description>We are having some strange issues using the tool against RTM. &amp;nbsp;When will that version be dropped so we can see if the issue is us or not? </description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#559877</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:11:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:559877</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>I just posted a new blog entry on the MSSCCI provider. &amp;nbsp;Go check it out!</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#8379874</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 15:22:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8379874</guid><dc:creator>Eric Decker</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm curious to see if the MSSCCI provider is available for MS Access 2007? &amp;nbsp;If so where can I get it? &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#8398078</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:15:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8398078</guid><dc:creator>michalma</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Msscci works with Access 2008:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/michalma/archive/2008/04/15/msscci-2008-with-ms-access-2007.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/michalma/archive/2008/04/15/msscci-2008-with-ms-access-2007.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Update on the TFS MSSCCI Provider</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2006/02/22/536840.aspx#8398085</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:17:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8398085</guid><dc:creator>michalma</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I meant Access 2007 of course, sorry :(&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>