<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Charting a course for TFS &amp;quot;Rosario&amp;quot;</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx</link><description>It's been on my mind recently to talk about some of the assumptions and pre-requisites that are going to exist for the Rosario release of Team Foundation Server.&amp;#160; The main reason is to make sure people have plenty of time to prepare for it.&amp;#160;</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8962340</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 18:08:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8962340</guid><dc:creator>bob53050</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the heads up Brian :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will certainly help our planning :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8962603</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:41:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8962603</guid><dc:creator>Klaus Even Enevoldsen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Skipping SQL Server 2005 was a surprise to me, looking forward to the next VPC CTP... :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>[VSTS] Aclarando dudas sobre Rosario (aunque el que aclara es otro …)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8962681</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:08:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8962681</guid><dc:creator>El Bruno</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Buenas, si bien el amigo Luis me ha tentado para desvelar la &amp;#250;ltima frikada que estoy haciendo; he logrado&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>[VSTS] Aclarando dudas sobre Rosario (aunque el que aclara es otro …)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8962682</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:08:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8962682</guid><dc:creator>El Bruno</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Buenas, si bien el amigo Luis me ha tentado para desvelar la &amp;#250;ltima frikada que estoy haciendo; he logrado&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>So what will we need to run 'Rosario'?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8962687</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:10:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8962687</guid><dc:creator>But it works on my PC!</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Harry has published an interesting post on the platform decisions for &amp;amp;#39;Rosario &amp;amp;#39;. The most&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>So what will we need to run 'Rosario'?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8962715</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:48:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8962715</guid><dc:creator>Richard Fennell</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian Harry has published an interesting post on the platform decisions for &amp;amp;#39;Rosario &amp;amp;#39;. The most&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8962987</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:06:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8962987</guid><dc:creator>Nicolai</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, thanks for this post.. Until now i didn't realize that it is impossible to use a MOSS, wich i've been trying for the last &amp;#189; month or so. Why does the manual state that i can use a MOSS or is it only a 2.0 MOSS?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But anyway thank you for the great info, this is really nice info, because we now can plan to move our TFS to one server instead of two server with different purposes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When is 'rosario' scheduled for?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8963001</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:16:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8963001</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;When I wrote, this I was just sure plenty of things would not be clear enough. &amp;nbsp;This is the first one :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You CAN use MOSS today (2.0 or 3.0). &amp;nbsp;Lot's of customers do. &amp;nbsp;However, today, TFS does not take advantage of any MOSS features. &amp;nbsp;Obviously you can use MOSS features along with the content we put in the portal but nothing we put in there uses more than base Sharepoint functionality.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We have not announced a date for Rosario yet. &amp;nbsp;It's our next major release. &amp;nbsp;All I can say at this point is keep watching my blog and I'll update you as we make progress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8963023</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:44:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8963023</guid><dc:creator>Doug Holland</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Deploying new versions of TFS is not something that anyone takes lightly and as they say, knowledge is power, so thank you for sharing some of the vision for TFS &amp;quot;Rosario&amp;quot; today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only, now I'm wondering how I'll upgrade my Laptop from Windows Server 2008 32-bit to Windows 2008 64-bit without a fresh install.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortunately, according to your road map I have until &amp;quot;Rosario&amp;quot; +1 before I'll have to do that and will most likely have a new laptop before then.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VSTS Links - 09/24/2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8963560</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 16:02:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8963560</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Charles Sterling on 4 New Training Sessions for Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) with Visual Studio...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8963664</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:27:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8963664</guid><dc:creator>Jason Camp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you very much for this article. We are very interested in moving to Rosario. What is the approximat release date so that we can plan for the SQL Server 2008 upgrade?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8963685</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 17:52:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8963685</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We have not announced a release date at this time. &amp;nbsp;In the not too distant future we will be giving some hints as to the basic timeframe but we won't narrow it down to a very specific time period for a while yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Important Rosario Planning Information</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8964852</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:35:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8964852</guid><dc:creator>Ahmed Salijee</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Rosario is the codename for the next version of Team Foundation Server. Brian Harry has just blogged&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8964889</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 14:31:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8964889</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Griepentrog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;will it be possible to install/run Rosario on a Domain Controller / SBS?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TFS2008 won't install on a DC, so it woult be nice to have this option.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8966384</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:15:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8966384</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I hate this question because the answer is always no and I always feel terrible about it. &amp;nbsp;It's been a few years now since we looked closely at the issues of running on a domain controller. &amp;nbsp;Our current plan is not to support this in Rosario either but I've asked the team to go back and refresh our memory on why this isn't just easy and assess whether or not it would be possible to get in Rosario.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8967455</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 11:52:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8967455</guid><dc:creator>Sven</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian, then please make sure, that Rosario works better in a domainless environment than TFS 2008. TFS Task Scheduler service and Code Coverage Analysis service depend on the netlogon service, which is not running in a domainless environment. So both TFS services don't start. Furthermore the installation of SP1 fails because the installer can't restart the Task Scheduler service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8967536</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:11:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8967536</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;OK, I'm going to look into that issue. &amp;nbsp;I wasn't aware of it. &amp;nbsp;The Task scheduler service has been rewritten for Rosario and the Code Coverage Analysis service is gone (it was a bizarre way to build it in the first place). &amp;nbsp;We'll make sure the new stuff works right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8970202</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:48:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8970202</guid><dc:creator>FreeToDev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the info. I've created a visual summary that may be helpful in those Rosario Budget meetings... &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://freetodev.spaces.live.com/blog/cns"&gt;http://freetodev.spaces.live.com/blog/cns&lt;/a&gt;!EC3C8F2028D842D5!622.entry&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8970947</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:31:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8970947</guid><dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Will you be supporting keyword expansion in Rosario?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8971589</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:46:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8971589</guid><dc:creator>Steve Nuchia</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I may be one of those referred to as not interested in the Portal features of TFS. &amp;nbsp;I'd like to add some clarification to my position on that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, other priorities have kept me from having time to even look at features that don't directly contribute to getting our next release out with proper SCC, build, and test support. &amp;nbsp;So things like reporting have taken a back seat. &amp;nbsp;We have an incumbent bug / work item tracking solution that is meeting our needs so there is no priority on using TFS WIT here. &amp;nbsp;Were the existing system not already successfully integrated into reasonably good practices it would be a very different story.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, we have a document management product and we &amp;quot;dogfood&amp;quot; it as a repository for our non-code development artifacts. &amp;nbsp;Again, were this not the case, the Portal features would be of much more immediate interest to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, please don't let my apparent dismissiveness of those features contribute to any reduction in their profiles. &amp;nbsp;My professional opinion is that they are valuable and important. &amp;nbsp;They just don't fit my present situation, for some pretty special reasons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-swn&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8973889</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:37:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8973889</guid><dc:creator>Tomas Scott</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Will Rosario depend on Office2007 or will just some features be missing?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am not sure we will upgrade to Office2007 in the timeframe Rosario ships.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#8974006</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:40:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8974006</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You can use Rosario without Office. &amp;nbsp;If you want to use TFS Office integation in Rosario, you will need Office 2007.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>TFS 2010 Admin, Operations &amp; Setup Improvements</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#9582537</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:48:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9582537</guid><dc:creator>bharry's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I started with the key architectural concepts, I think the most appropriate place (though perhaps&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>5 Quick Steps to Get Introduced with Visual Studio Team System and Team Foundation Server 2010 (Beta 1)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#9691334</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:13:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9691334</guid><dc:creator>.NETTER Characters...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Last month (May 2009) Microsoft has released its first beta for Visual Studio Team System 2010 and Team&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>5 Quick Steps to Get Introduced with Visual Studio Team System and Team Foundation Server 2010 (Beta 1)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#9691339</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:14:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9691339</guid><dc:creator>.NETTER Characters...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Last month (May 2009) Microsoft has released its first beta for Visual Studio Team System 2010 and Team&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#9898045</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:04:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9898045</guid><dc:creator>Phillip LeMaster</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are running TFS 2005 and just purchased a new 64ibt server and installed Windows 2008 R2 and then found out TFS 2008 does not support 64bit at this time. &amp;nbsp;I read that TFS 2008 would support 64bit in the future and so would TFS 2010. &amp;nbsp;When will there be an update for either TFS 2008 or RTM for TFS 2010? &amp;nbsp;Is there an upgrade path from 2010 beta 1 to RTM? &amp;nbsp;Will there be a TFS 2008 SP2 for 64bit?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Charting a course for TFS "Rosario"</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bharry/archive/2008/09/23/charting-a-course-for-tfs-rosario.aspx#9898061</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:31:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9898061</guid><dc:creator>bharry</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm afraid there isn't and won't ever be a 64-bit TFS 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TFS 2010 supports 64-bit now. &amp;nbsp;Beta 2 will be available very shortly and has a &amp;quot;go-live&amp;quot; license associated with it. &amp;nbsp;Upgrading from Beta 2 to RTM will be straight forward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While upgrading from Beta 1 may work, it is not broadly supported.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>