<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Microsoft Officially Announces HD Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx</link><description>Didn't we already do that? Regular readers of my blog (which is a tad oxymoronic, since it appears I have a hard time being a regular poster) already know all about HD Photo. We've been talking about at various conferences, via this blog and on various</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Microsoft Officially Announces HD Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1859940</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:42:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1859940</guid><dc:creator>Citezein</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was quite interested to see how HD Photo faired against JPEG, given the claims made. My results haven't been very good though and I'm wondering if you could comment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This shows the differences:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/128/417638386_6745780e3c_o.png"&gt;http://farm1.static.flickr.com/128/417638386_6745780e3c_o.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the same file size, the HD Photo image has blocky backgrounds and artifacts around fine detail areas on the face. These were both created from the same original master file at 8bit, sRGB. The HD Photo version was created with the Photoshop plugin set to 61% so that the files were the same size.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I doing something wrong? Would the advanced features of the export plugin have helped me get a better result? I can provide the original image if you're interested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Announces HD-Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1860157</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 20:32:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1860157</guid><dc:creator>Steve Rowe's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Once known as Windows Media Photo, Microsoft just released a new photo format called HD-Photo. Bill Crow&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Announces HD-Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1860331</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:44:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1860331</guid><dc:creator>RSS It All</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Once known as Windows Media Photo, Microsoft just released a new photo format called HD-Photo. Bill Crow&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>HD Photo Follow Up</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1861025</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:34:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1861025</guid><dc:creator>Robert Accettura's Fun With Wordage</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A few days ago I mentioned there are some limitations with HD Photo in it&amp;amp;#8217;s current state. The limitations are in the legal sense. Specifically they prohibit open source implementations. This obviously hinders adoption as many large organizati..&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Officially Announces HD Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1861915</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 04:38:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1861915</guid><dc:creator>billcrow</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Citezein,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be great if you could provide me a link to the original image, or at a minimum, let me know the resolution of the original so I know what compression ratio you're trying to achieve. &amp;nbsp;I'd be happy to do my own test and provide my recomendations for encoder settings. &amp;nbsp;This is also the type of issue we're looking to fine tune with this beta release, making the simple encoder controls as intuitive as possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bill Crow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HD Photo Program Manager&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Officially Announces HD Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1861975</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:14:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1861975</guid><dc:creator>Citezein</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Bill,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original file is a CR2 raw from a Canon Digital Rebel XTi. I took it into Photoshop from Lightroom, converted it to 8bit sRGB and resized to 600 x 900px. I then applied a small amount of sharpening with Smart Sharpen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The file, with those changes made and saved as a PSD can be downloaded from my site: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://brian.vallelunga.com/files/headshot.zip"&gt;http://brian.vallelunga.com/files/headshot.zip&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HD Photo seemed to have issues in the out of focus background and in the skin and hair on the face. The background lost its smoothness and there is visible blockiness. The skin, especially around the eyes, mouth, and cheeks also appears to have artifacts and a coarseness not there in the original. If you'd like the original CR2 raw file to play with, just let me know. I'm interested in seeing the results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm going to try HD Photo on a photo with more fine detail such as a landscape and see if it fairs better under those conditions.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>MS announces HD Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1866074</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:29:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1866074</guid><dc:creator>Mattias talks about BizTalk, .NET, TFS, etc.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft has announced HD Photo , formerly known as Windows Media Photo. Bill Crow has much more information&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Great news, about the standardization</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1871922</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:59:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1871922</guid><dc:creator>jmuffat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Good luck with the standard! As of myself, HD photo just sounds like the perfect format to replace TIF when saving/transmitting a processed photo. This all sounds very promising, keep up the good work !&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Microsoft Officially Announces HD Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#1892917</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 10:28:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1892917</guid><dc:creator>someone</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Please update the Picture and Fax Viewer for XP to support HD Photo/WM Photo. And some tool on XP to create HD Photo files.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Tech update 2007.05</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#2923963</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 21:16:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2923963</guid><dc:creator>Bits and Bytes</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Τα 10 πιο σημαντικά νέα χαρακτηριστικά (σύμφωνα με το BetaNews) του Windows Server 2008 (πρώην Longhorn&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Tech update 2007.05</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2007/03/11/microsoft-officially-announces-hd-photo.aspx#2923965</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 21:16:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2923965</guid><dc:creator>Bits and Bytes</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Τα 10 πιο σημαντικά νέα χαρακτηριστικά (σύμφωνα με το BetaNews) του Windows Server 2008 (πρώην Longhorn&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>