http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2006/10/20/msu-evaluates-windows-media-photo-vs-jpeg-2000.aspxThe fine folks at the Graphics and Media Lab at Moscow State University (MSU) have completed a comparison of Windows Media Photo and nine different implementations of JPEG-2000. Their results are right in line with our own analysis; it confirms our messageen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2006/10/20/msu-evaluates-windows-media-photo-vs-jpeg-2000.aspx#862041Mon, 23 Oct 2006 14:03:20 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:862041Microsoft’s WMP not better than Jpeg 2000? - The Data Compression News Blog - c10n.info<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.c10n.info/archives/454">http://www.c10n.info/archives/454</a></p> http://blogs.msdn.com/billcrow/archive/2006/10/20/msu-evaluates-windows-media-photo-vs-jpeg-2000.aspx#2058469Mon, 09 Apr 2007 09:46:24 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2058469笨笨<p>本文从HD和JPEG2000的原理出发分析两个问题： 1。为什么在低压缩比的时候HD的图象看起来比JPEG2000要好 2。为什么在高压缩比的情况下JPEG2000的质量要比HD好。 这也为大家了解HD和JPEG2000优缺点提供了一个机会。另外本文也从另一个角度说明了：HD并不象微软所说的那么强。</p>