<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>patterns &amp;amp; practices SharePoint Drop is Available on Codeplex</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/blaine/archive/2008/08/28/patterns-practices-sharepoint-drop-is-available-on-codeplex.aspx</link><description>In a previous post , I talked about starting a new project to create SharePoint guidance. We heard you need guidance to help with: Unit testing and debugging Packaging and deployment Setting up a team development environment Unclear which SharePoint features/</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>car insurance &amp;raquo; patterns &amp;amp; practices SharePoint Drop is Available on Codeplex</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/blaine/archive/2008/08/28/patterns-practices-sharepoint-drop-is-available-on-codeplex.aspx#8902826</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:44:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8902826</guid><dc:creator>car insurance &amp;raquo; patterns &amp;amp; practices SharePoint Drop is Available on Codeplex</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://hoursfunnywallpaper.cn/?p=3469"&gt;http://hoursfunnywallpaper.cn/?p=3469&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>p&amp;p Sharepoint Guidance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/blaine/archive/2008/08/28/patterns-practices-sharepoint-drop-is-available-on-codeplex.aspx#8903224</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:54:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8903224</guid><dc:creator>Simon Ince's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Via Blaine’s post (that gives quite a lot of information on what is included and what their plans are),&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: patterns &amp; practices SharePoint Drop is Available on Codeplex</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/blaine/archive/2008/08/28/patterns-practices-sharepoint-drop-is-available-on-codeplex.aspx#8903361</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:36:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8903361</guid><dc:creator>chadmyers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was curious what the plan was for unit testing. &amp;nbsp;SharePoint is not known for it's test-friendliness and has caused me a lot of headaches in this department. I'm greatly interested to see what your plan is for guidance in this area.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: patterns &amp; practices SharePoint Drop is Available on Codeplex</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/blaine/archive/2008/08/28/patterns-practices-sharepoint-drop-is-available-on-codeplex.aspx#8904234</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:03:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8904234</guid><dc:creator>blaine</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We are using some of the patterns used for the Web such as MVP so we can separate the view from the view logic. Where we need to call SharePoint, we are abstrating this to common class. When we need to unit test SharePoint, we are using TypeMock which allows helps us deal with sealed classes and/or internal constructors. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Francis discusses this in his most recent blog post: &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/francischeung/archive/2008/08/22/unit-testing-sharepoint-2007-applications.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/francischeung/archive/2008/08/22/unit-testing-sharepoint-2007-applications.aspx&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>