http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspxAbstract A very common deployment scenario for Silverlight 1.1 Applications is to be hosted from Windows Server 2003/IIS6 environments. This implies that the development environment for Silverlight will be based in .Net Framework 3.5 while the deploymenten-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#4696221Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:04:55 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4696221Expression & UX in Asia<p>Liquid Boy blog has a great set of posts on building a Silverlight v1.1 application that looks like the</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#4696641Sun, 02 Sep 2007 04:27:57 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4696641Noticias externas<p>Liquid Boy blog has a great set of posts on building a Silverlight v1.1 application that looks like the</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#4852313Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:25:26 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4852313Jacob Pettersson<p>Great post, helped me figure out why my deployed enviroment wasnt working. Of course the silverlight app must be compiled against the deployed relay service in the host - doh!</p>http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#4879669Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:36:20 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4879669chabrook<p>Great article. &nbsp;Ill make sure to mention on my BLOG as well.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#4897359Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:55:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4897359Bob Familiar<p>Glad it was useful Jacob! -bob</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#4930026Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:00:36 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4930026Bill Newmiller<p>Thanks, Bob. This saved me hours of work!</p>http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#5079673Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:49:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5079673Ahmed Qurashi<p>In the Silverlight forums there are guides to developing Silverlight 1.1 apps using VS 2005 that can allow for more fine grained control of your projects. But with the drawback of no 'Orcas' specific features can be used.</p> <p>That is a great caveat you suggested: capabilities should outweigh risk. For example, the functions found in the System.Windows.Browser namespace in System.Silverlight.dll allow complete client side access to the entire hosting DOM tree. It can lead to very powerful RIA scenarios but is quite experimental, both technically and usability-wise. </p>http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#5079807Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:58:30 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5079807DotNetKicks.com<p>You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#5105330Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:38:53 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5105330WynApse<p>Silverlight Cream for September 24, 2007</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#5105609Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:59:39 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5105609neuralocity<p>&quot;what you can do is add a web service to the SilverlightHost project that wraps the call to the legacy web service&quot;</p> <p>Doesn't this double the number of TCP connections on the server-side?</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#5127373Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:27:44 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5127373Bob Familiar<p>The suggestions here are work arounds for limitations that exist with the alpha release. I suspect that as Silverlight 1.1 moves into Beta, I will need to revisit this article and update it based on new features. -bob</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#5434058Sat, 13 Oct 2007 05:45:21 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5434058Bob's Blog<p>In my last post I announced the ReMIX07 Boston Soundtrack application and provided the iframe for embedding</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#6770517Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:09:49 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6770517Josh Smith<p>THANK YOU! &nbsp;This post made my life much easier. &nbsp;:)</p>http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#6792669Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:59:41 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6792669Josh Smith<p>I have spent a lot of time recently coming up to speed with Silverlight 1.1. It is the alpha version</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#6795754Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:09:44 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6795754Josh Smith<p>I have spent a lot of time recently coming up to speed with Silverlight 2.0. It is the alpha version</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#7227428Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:27:53 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7227428Zhiming Xue's WebLog<p>The Microsoft East Region DPE team has started in our blogs what we called &quot;Architect Point of View&quot;.</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/bobfamiliar/archive/2007/08/30/adopting-silverlight-an-architects-point-of-view.aspx#7227478Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:32:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7227478Noticias externas<p>The Microsoft East Region DPE team has started in our blogs what we called &amp;quot;Architect Point of View&amp;quot;</p>