<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Source code for CLR\BCL 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2006/03/23/559603.aspx</link><description>Great news... Rotor V2.0 ships ... I have found Rotor a great way to look at (mostly) the real source code from the CLR and BCL to see what is really going on under the covers.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Source code for CLR\BCL 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2006/03/23/559603.aspx#559737</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:06:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:559737</guid><dc:creator>flagman</dc:creator><description>First,Congratulations your jolt award of FDG and thx to your and Krzysztof's work.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As u've said the Framework was the two &amp;nbsp;most close to u, my question is, what the diff between reallife .Net Framework and the toy 'Rotor' from the perspective of FRAMEWORK DESIGN.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Naturely, reallife .net framework was been made or architected first, then Rotor done. Hence, with the exp of architect for .net framework ,the architect for Rotor should have been impoved, is this conclusion correct?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;thx in advance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>Neil Cowburn - Shared Source CLI (ROTOR) v2.0 is out: Co-Founder of OpenNETCF</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2006/03/23/559603.aspx#559740</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:10:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:559740</guid><dc:creator>Neil Cowburn - Shared Source CLI (ROTOR) v2.0 is out: Co-Founder of OpenNETCF</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.opennetcf.org/ncowburn/2006/03/24/SharedSourceCLIROTORV20IsOut.aspx"&gt;http://blog.opennetcf.org/ncowburn/2006/03/24/SharedSourceCLIROTORV20IsOut.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Source code for CLR\BCL 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2006/03/23/559603.aspx#559919</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:19:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:559919</guid><dc:creator>BradA</dc:creator><description>Flagman -- The Rotor source code is exactly the same source we use to build the product... we didn't reimplement the CLR or anything like that. &amp;nbsp;We did remove\change some parts where Microsoft has some signficant IP (such as the GC\JIT) and we cleaned up a few comments, things like that.. but it is very largly the same code we use to build CLR 2.0</description></item><item><title>Shared Source CLR is available for V2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2006/03/23/559603.aspx#560298</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:30:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:560298</guid><dc:creator>Mike Stall's .NET Debugging Blog</dc:creator><description>In case you haven't already heard from every other blogger (like Shawn, JasonZ and Brad) , V2.0 of the...</description></item><item><title>Source code for CLR\BCL 2.0</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2006/03/23/559603.aspx#562339</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:52:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:562339</guid><dc:creator>The Crooked Links</dc:creator><description>ROTOR contains most of the CLR and base class libraries found in our commerical product. It is released under the shared source program. [via]...</description></item></channel></rss>