<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Field Theory</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Personal Productivity - Part 2</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/2007/06/26/3532698.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 03:12:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3532698</guid><dc:creator>bradka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/comments/3532698.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3532698</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;This &lt;a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/06/the_pmarca_guid.html" target="_blank"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; on "productivity pr0n" has been doing the rounds, but following my post on &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/2007/06/25/3511898.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;Multitasking for Productivity&lt;/a&gt; I thought it might be a nice follow-on.&amp;nbsp;In particular I like the idea of &lt;strong&gt;not keeping a schedule&lt;/strong&gt; - that's brilliant!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Given customer commitments and what-not, it may be hard to drop my schedule completely, but I think the underlying principle is sound.&amp;nbsp; One of the chief causes of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stress_management" target="_blank"&gt;stress&lt;/a&gt; is not having control or influence over our workload and I would concur that a highly structured schedule actually diminishes one's ability to do the things you want/need to.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Note that the other key point here is not that you should abandon all work or obligations, rather that a looser schedule allows you to focus on what is most important at the time.&amp;nbsp; I hate to think of all the times I've been dragged into a standing meeting while far more important matters were on the boil.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I think I'm actually going to try this.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3532698" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/collaboration/default.aspx">collaboration</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/rant/default.aspx">rant</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/productivity/default.aspx">productivity</category></item><item><title>Multitasking for Productivity</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/2007/06/25/3511898.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 07:39:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3511898</guid><dc:creator>bradka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/comments/3511898.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/commentrss.aspx?PostID=3511898</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.annezelenka.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Anne Zelenka&lt;/a&gt; makes a very good&amp;nbsp;point with here recent posting on &lt;a href="http://webworkerdaily.com/2007/06/24/connected-mode-multitasking-for-productivity/" target="_blank"&gt;Multitasking for Productivity&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Most of today's productivity fetishists harp on about isolating one's self from distractions (i.e. input) in order to "get things done" - I think the issue has been overblown.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;As Anne correctly points out, there are a limited number of specific activities that do in fact require sustained periods of intellectual work, such as complex programming or writing a book.&amp;nbsp; However, modern life is more about connecting people and data together, as opposed to locking one's self away to complete your masterpiece.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Even programming is changing, with more widespread acceptance of techniques like &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pair_programming" target="_blank"&gt;Pair Programming&lt;/a&gt;, which leverages social effects to improve the breed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This piece just struck a chord with me - am a bit sick of all the &lt;a href="http://lifehacker.com/" target="_blank"&gt;Lifehacker&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done" target="_blank"&gt;GTD&lt;/a&gt; productivity pr0n.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3511898" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/rant/default.aspx">rant</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/productivity/default.aspx">productivity</category></item><item><title>Busy by Default</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/2007/05/02/2367358.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 06:01:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2367358</guid><dc:creator>bradka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/comments/2367358.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2367358</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;What the difference a default makes.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Upon joining Microsoft I know have the pleasure of using &lt;a href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-au/communicator/default.aspx?ofcresset=1"&gt;Office Communicator&lt;/a&gt; as my primary IM client, as opposed to &lt;a href="http://www.ibm.com/software/sw-lotus/sametime"&gt;Lotus SameTime&lt;/a&gt; while at IBM.&amp;nbsp; Nothing inherently wrong with that since basic IM functionality is pretty well established across the board.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;The interesting thing is how Office Communicator handles presence information - in particular integration with one's Outlook calendar.&amp;nbsp; By default Communicator looks into your calendar and, if you are scheduled to be in a meeting or otherwise occupied, sets your presence status accordingly.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;In theory this is a great idea and offers tight integration between calendar and IM functions.&amp;nbsp; In practice it has the effect of making one seem more busy than perhaps you really are.&amp;nbsp; Meetings don't always happen as planned, or take as long as planned - similarly, assuming I have my laptop with me I may very well be able to exchange brief IM messages, as opposed to phone calls or e-mails.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Maybe it's just me, but I find this default behavious acts as somewhat of a collaboration disincentive.&amp;nbsp; Of course I've now learned to just go ahead and "ping" people anyway - even if they're shown as busy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2367358" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/microsoft/default.aspx">microsoft</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/collaboration/default.aspx">collaboration</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/sametime/default.aspx">sametime</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/IM/default.aspx">IM</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/communicator/default.aspx">communicator</category></item><item><title>Windows Live Writer</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/2007/05/02/2366815.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:06:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2366815</guid><dc:creator>bradka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/comments/2366815.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/commentrss.aspx?PostID=2366815</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Well - Finally getting out from under the deluge of information, training, and work&amp;nbsp;that constituted my first few weeks at Microsoft.&amp;nbsp; Of course the first thing I need to do is set up some kind of editor so I figured I'd give the &lt;a href="http://windowslivewriter.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!D85741BB5E0BE8AA!174.entry"&gt;Windows Live Writer Beta&lt;/a&gt; a try.&amp;nbsp; Previously blogging efforts had entailed using &lt;a href="http://scribefire.com/"&gt;ScribeFire/Performancing&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/"&gt;Firefox,&lt;/a&gt; but it's probably more appropriate to try out some of our new technology.&amp;nbsp; See how it goes, I guess.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=2366815" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/scribefire/default.aspx">scribefire</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/firefox/default.aspx">firefox</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/livewriter/default.aspx">livewriter</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/performancing/default.aspx">performancing</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/blogging/default.aspx">blogging</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/microsoft/default.aspx">microsoft</category></item><item><title>Becoming Microsoft</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/2007/03/24/1940492.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1940492</guid><dc:creator>bradka</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/comments/1940492.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1940492</wfw:commentRss><description>Well - this has been a long time coming.&amp;nbsp; I'm finally working at Microsoft, which has been a long-held goal for me.&amp;nbsp; It's been a circuitous route, with significant stints at awesome companies such as &lt;a href="http://www.pwc.com/" target="_blank" mce_href="http://www.pwc.com/"&gt;PricewaterhouseCoopers&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.ibm.com" mce_href="http://www.ibm.com"&gt;IBM&lt;/a&gt;, along with an ultimately less pleasant tour with &lt;a href="http://news.com.com/ExciteHome+files+for+bankruptcy/2100-1033_3-273689.html" mce_href="http://news.com.com/ExciteHome+files+for+bankruptcy/2100-1033_3-273689.html"&gt;Excite@Home&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I'm not sure what to expect, and the first few days have been a blur of meeting new people, getting set up, and learning about the business, but I'm genuinely excited to be here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1940492" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/microsoft/default.aspx">microsoft</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/personal/default.aspx">personal</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/excite/default.aspx">excite</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/ibm/default.aspx">ibm</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/bradkasell/archive/tags/pwc/default.aspx">pwc</category></item></channel></rss>