<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx</link><description>I noticed this last week but forgot to blog about it. If you do a google search and the result is an Open XML file (.docx; .xlsx; .pptx) they give you the ability to view them in the browser using their own rendering technology. They support all three</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7145619</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:11:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7145619</guid><dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So when Google turn up at a TC meeting and comment about the spec being something that they can't implement are they representing themselves or the corporation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Stephen pointed out a while ago that IBM have also implemented the spec in Lotus Quickr 8, although I've yet to take the time to look at how far they have got. The product documentation states that you can import OpenXML files into Lotus Quickr without the need for Office on the PC doing the importing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://notes2self.net/archive/2007/08/07/lotus-quickr-8-amp-openxml.aspx"&gt;http://notes2self.net/archive/2007/08/07/lotus-quickr-8-amp-openxml.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7146835</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:14:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7146835</guid><dc:creator>hAl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It looks like only XLSX files are supported that way and not DOCX files yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also it seems that Google search with filetype:docx is still missing a lot of files that I can find workings links to, using Live search contains:docx search parameter. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyways Brain, why does Google support the filetype:docx search parameter whilst your own Live search still does not. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7148913</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:37:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7148913</guid><dc:creator>Ben Langhinrichs</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, you are right that it is a heck of a lot better than the ODF spreadsheet support, which seems to be nothing but grabbing the text out of the document. &amp;nbsp;I'm betting that Rob Weir doesn't blog about this feature.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7149267</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:47:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7149267</guid><dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anybody know how it comes that so few docx files are found by google? I'm pro Office OpenXML, but Rob Weird used google results as arguments against the widespread use of the new file format, so I think it should be examined how it comes to this!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7149348</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:04:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7149348</guid><dc:creator>A</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there might be a lot of users who are afraid to switch to the Office 2007 because of the new UI. &amp;nbsp;Those types of people are also the same type of people who would be afraid to download the compatibility pack for 2003, fearing that it might &amp;quot;mess up their machine&amp;quot;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These people don't care about the format itself, they just don't want to change the way they work. &amp;nbsp;For example, I had to search for the fields option several times before I could remember where they were in the Ribbon. &amp;nbsp;Some users just don't want to have to deal with that. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those who are not afraid upgrading are aware that there are people out there who are, so are still saving their formats as 2003 for the benefit of the others. &amp;nbsp;I know in my office there are a handful of us who are using 2007, but since the bulk of us aren't, we save our docx files as doc to share them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will change, but there is a lot of inertia in companies (&amp;quot;why invest time and money for the new Office when the one we've got is working fine?&amp;quot; &amp;nbsp;You'll probably find a lot of companies running Office 2000) and home users (&amp;quot;you mean I've got to relearn everything?&amp;quot;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I suspect that is just one of many reasons why we aren't seeing that many files out there. &amp;nbsp;I'm sure Rob would love to say it's because of the OOXML to ODF converter, and the lack of docx is because everyone's converting ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Open XML links for 01-18-2007</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7149822</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:16:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7149822</guid><dc:creator>Doug Mahugh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Google's support for the Open XML formats continues to improve. They recently started identifying DOCX,&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7151719</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:31:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7151719</guid><dc:creator>aristippus</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The weird thing is that it has now reduced to 3380 when I search.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also found that Websphere Portal can convert Office 2007 documents to HTML automatically:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wpdoc/v6r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.wp.zos.doc/wpf/dcs_info.html"&gt;http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wpdoc/v6r0/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.wp.zos.doc/wpf/dcs_info.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DB2 Content Manager V8.4 supports Open XML - &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21288972"&gt;http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21288972&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe you can list these as Open XML apps as well ;) At this rate, IBM will be hogging the list.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well it looks like the following orgs are using xlsx:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bayer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.stockholders-newsletter-q3-06.bayer.com/en/bayer_regions_Q3_06.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;State of West Virginia&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wvde.state.wv.us/materials/STEP7Allocation2007-08.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Washington State Board of Education&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.sbe.wa.gov/GraduationRequirementsDatabase1.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;State of Idaho&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.pte.state.id.us/Forms_Publications/Agriculture/FFA/American%20Honorary%20Teacher.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kentucky Board of Emergency Services&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kbems.kctcs.edu/Senate%20bill%2066%2008%20Apps%20Received.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;University of North Carolina&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ils.unc.edu/courses/2008_spring/inls261_001/materials/task04.spreadsheets/Formulas_practice.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;University of Oregon&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/dspace/bitstream/1794/4956/1/patron-1.xlsx"&gt;https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/dspace/bitstream/1794/4956/1/patron-1.xlsx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;East Hampshire Council (in the UK and within Lotus Notes, for extra comedy value)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;www.easthants.gov.uk/allservices.nsf/0/F35E89A101CBF23F802573D00033AEA2/$File/Summary+June+06.xlsx&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There were what looked like a bunch of other universities, government departments etc around the world too, but I got bored of looking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will be interesting to see what this looks like in a year's time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I certainly know some of our users are using xlsx, mainly for &amp;gt;65K row support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gareth&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7151799</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:40:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7151799</guid><dc:creator>Dave S.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@A - One of the things users expect in a compatible application is not that the formats are compatible but that the interface is. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I've been trying Office 2007 for a while and find so many of the commonly used features (for me) carefully hidden in places that are not intuitive. Intuitive really means 'already familiar with,' either by direct experience or a migration of one experience to another. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my case, that would be 6 wordprocessors, 5 spreadsheets, 5 CAD systems, 5 operating systems - being not intuitive means not using any previous convention. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Used to be - Insert Break. Now it is Page Layout Break. Except Page breaks don't really affect the page layout, just which page or how many pages the information is on. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, there's a training cost. Imagine a company with 50,000 employess taking just 8 hours apiece at, say, $12 an hour average. Is that an amount you would spend for those employess to do exactly the same job in exactly the same way after also paying for all new software licences? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don't know how many people use MS Office software, but this little interface change is going to cost the US a large amount of money. It's difficult to imagine a productivity payback to offset it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7152367</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 22:40:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7152367</guid><dc:creator>Dave S.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting - &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Opera flags www.meerlytalking.com as blacklisted. Never had Opera put up a notice like that before. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Probably their ISP supplies unscrupulous people with web access. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can't see the big deal though. The most complex formula in that sheet is what was available in Lotus 1-2-3 circa 1986; it doesn't even use named ranges, which were available then. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Aren't the precalc'd values stored with the cell numbers anyway? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One still cannot rename the columns so that a formula such as =sum(Huckabee) can be written with &amp;quot;Huckabee&amp;quot; clearly at the top of the column. Sure one can use row one, place names in the columns (as is done here) but then everyone has to be careful not to rename the &amp;quot;Huckabee&amp;quot; range, or change the row 1 entry to &amp;quot;Paul.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A look at the sophistication of the .xlsx sheets out there suggests that most users posting their stuff could have done quite well with 1-2-3. I'm a bit hesitant to open the russian and chinese sourced files to see what they are like. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7152849</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:32:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7152849</guid><dc:creator>JasonG</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I found searching for more advanced xlsx documents to be illuminating. &amp;nbsp;Some of the more advanced formatting options are not supported in html view, but many formula are. &amp;nbsp;I checked out &amp;quot;Cell Conditions&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;ANSI Character Set&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of interest is the differing off-by-one results between &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://librayeung.com/excelwrong.xlsx"&gt;http://librayeung.com/excelwrong.xlsx&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:jWY5XVnAWVIJ:librayeung.com/excelwrong.xlsx+filetype:xlsx&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=3&amp;amp;gl=us"&gt;http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:jWY5XVnAWVIJ:librayeung.com/excelwrong.xlsx+filetype:xlsx&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;cd=3&amp;amp;gl=us&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kudos to the Google team! &amp;nbsp;wonder when we'll see compatibility in Google docs and spreadsheets?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Google support for Open XML formats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7153062</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:58:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7153062</guid><dc:creator>wmigda</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;yeah, that is something - displaying simple spreadsheet data, great success! Do you honestly think, that displaying this spreadsheet is the hardest thing a developer could face when attempting to implement at least a tiny part of the over-6000-page-specification non-ISO ECMA-pay-per-validation OOXML format? I bet they (google) will stop right there or soon after, since OOXML defined the way it is done now is a developer's worst nightmare (or they have at hand a sizeable bunch of spare cheap monkeys willing to dig in with improving OOXML support in google).&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>IBM and Google Support for Open XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7155181</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:07:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7155181</guid><dc:creator>Craig Kitterman's Interoperability Community Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have read a number of blogs posts and articles recently that demonstrate the groundswell of support&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>IBM and Google Support for Open XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7155243</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 04:16:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7155243</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have read a number of blogs posts and articles recently that demonstrate the groundswell of support&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>[PL] Open Xml - czyli jak to "przeciwnicy" formatu po cichu go wspierają</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7184048</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7184048</guid><dc:creator>Only Human | Devoted to technology v.2.0</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Im jestem starszy tym trudniej mi uciec od stwierdzenia, że świat jest pełen hipokryzji. Czasem to, aż&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>[PL] Open Xml - czyli jak to "przeciwnicy" formatu po cichu go wspierają</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7184313</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:04:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7184313</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Im jestem starszy tym trudniej mi uciec od stwierdzenia, że świat jest pełen hipokryzji. Czasem to, aż&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Open XML: I vantaggi pratici di un formato aperto</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7199110</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:28:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7199110</guid><dc:creator>Inside Office Online Italia</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Un po’ di tempo fa ti ho parlato del nuovo formato documentale Office Open XML e del suo cammino nel&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Open XML: I vantaggi pratici di un formato aperto</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7199330</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:01:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7199330</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Un po’ di tempo fa ti ho parlato del nuovo formato documentale Office Open XML e del suo cammino nel&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The crazy world of Open XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7488956</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:18:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7488956</guid><dc:creator>OfficeRocker!</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With the ballot resolution later this month, the temperature is high around the issues on Open XML.&amp;amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>The crazy world of Open XML</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2008/01/17/google-support-for-open-xml-formats.aspx#7489210</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:49:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7489210</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;With the ballot resolution later this month, the temperature is high around the issues on Open XML.&amp;amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>