<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx</link><description>We're still ironing out a few more wrinkles in preparation for the dogfood upgrade , but I wanted to go let folks know that it's going to require two server machines to install. With beta 2 we had a setup that would allow you to install it all on a single</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Visual Studio Team System</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#437852</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 06:38:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:437852</guid><dc:creator>II's Musings</dc:creator><description>Personally, i'm very excited about VSTS and all the new exciting things that will be a part of that....</description></item><item><title>re: Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#437899</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:23:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:437899</guid><dc:creator>David</dc:creator><description>Could you explain a bit why you droped AD/AM? It seems that it was designed precisely for a soluation like yours, so if it didn't fit this might be a problem with the overall AD/AM architecture, right?</description></item><item><title>July CTP of VSTS details</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#437933</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:03:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:437933</guid><dc:creator>the roarty blog</dc:creator><description>Just started lunch and had a browse of blogs.msdn.com. Buck Hodges has posted interesting details of...</description></item><item><title>re: Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#438038</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:32:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:438038</guid><dc:creator>Stuart Ballard</dc:creator><description>Any news on when the first CTP or Beta will come out that has the recently-announced VS2003 compatibility layer in it?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I desperately want to start testing this for our company because we are going to move to TF for source control as soon as we possibly can, but migrating our product to VS2005 will take a long time because of the (IMHO stupid) web project changes that are going to make us have to jump through hoops to do things that we rely heavily on today.</description></item><item><title>Team System Links...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#438096</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:36:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:438096</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>Eric Jarvi - VSTS Tip: Assigned to @Me&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Eric discusses a special identifier called @me for use in your...</description></item><item><title>re: Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#438205</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 04:05:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:438205</guid><dc:creator>Bruce Lee</dc:creator><description>Sounds great!</description></item><item><title>Changes coming in VSTS July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#438745</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:21:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:438745</guid><dc:creator>Anthony Borton's Blog</dc:creator><description>I was just reading with some interest some of the changes we are going to see in the July CTP release...</description></item><item><title>New Team System Stuff - 2005-07-14</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#439062</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 04:35:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:439062</guid><dc:creator>Rob Caron's Blog</dc:creator><description>Visual Studio Team System&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There’s a new Team System community site – TeamSystemRocks.com! ⊕ &lt;br&gt;Well,...</description></item><item><title>re: Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#439790</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 23:48:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:439790</guid><dc:creator>buckh</dc:creator><description>Stuart, I do not have information on when the VS2003 TF source control plugin will be available.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#441624</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 05:22:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:441624</guid><dc:creator>cs</dc:creator><description>Are we sill going to need a 2003 domain? It would be nice to be able to run it in 2000 mode.</description></item><item><title>re: Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#443622</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 02:01:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:443622</guid><dc:creator>buckh</dc:creator><description>Regarding domains, here's the current story.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At RTM Team Foundation will support W2K3 &amp;amp; W2K domains.  In fact we are in the process of testing with W2K right now.&lt;br&gt; &lt;br&gt;So, while it might work for July CTP (some have said it does) we are looking to have this nailed down shortly.</description></item><item><title>July CTP for Team Foundation is headed your way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#444029</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:34:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:444029</guid><dc:creator>Buck Hodges</dc:creator><description>Rob Caron just posted that the July CTP&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;is making its way through MSDN now.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; As Rob points...</description></item><item><title>July CTP for Team Foundation is headed your way</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#444031</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:35:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:444031</guid><dc:creator>Buck Hodges</dc:creator><description>Rob Caron just posted that the July CTP&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;is making its way through MSDN now.&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; As Rob points...</description></item><item><title>What's coming in the July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#444341</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:01:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:444341</guid><dc:creator>Chris Menegay's Weblog</dc:creator><description>The July CTP is coming out soon and I got news of some of what will be included, as well as things that...</description></item><item><title>July VSTS/VSTF CTP released</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#445608</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:26:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445608</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Beehler's Blog</dc:creator><description>The VSTS teams are dogfooding a new drop of Team Foundation to use on a daily basis. I've been writing...</description></item><item><title>re: Info on the upcoming July CTP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckh/archive/2005/07/11/437820.aspx#445782</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:45:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445782</guid><dc:creator>buckh</dc:creator><description>Dave, we stopped using AD/AM in the product for two reasons.  First is that backing up AD/AM is different than backing up SQL Server databases.  Since all of the rest of our data lives in SQL Server, that meant our customers had to manage backup and restore for yet something else.  Second is that it also gave users something else that needed to be managed.  Again, using SQL for everything means less new stuff to manage.</description></item></channel></rss>