<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Windows 2008 and Replication</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckwoody/archive/2008/05/05/windows-2008-and-replication.aspx</link><description>I mentioned in a previous post that I would point out where SQL Server 2008 takes advantage of improvments in Windows 2008 (Check out the "Windows 2008" tag below for that). I just had to share something I got today from the replication team in an e-mail:</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Mejoras en Replicación en SQL Server 2008 con Windows Server 2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckwoody/archive/2008/05/05/windows-2008-and-replication.aspx#8460644</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 18:01:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8460644</guid><dc:creator>Eladio Rincón, SQL Server MVP</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Parece que los equipos de Windows y SQL han trabajado juntos para mejorar el rendimiento de las r&amp;#233;plicas&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>SQL Server 2008 Performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/buckwoody/archive/2008/05/05/windows-2008-and-replication.aspx#8473480</link><pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 21:28:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8473480</guid><dc:creator>EXEC dbo.LongTermMemory__Archive</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;SQL Server 2008 has not yet been released but nevertheless there are already some test results from the&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>