<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Another Microsoft Blogger : Consumer Tech</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Consumer Tech</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>information technology evolving similar to how American cities have evolved?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/04/20/116331.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:116331</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/116331.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=116331</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I love essays like this that stretch my thinking and give me new conceptual models for understanding what I see happening each day. According to &lt;A href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/architecture/journal/default.aspx?pull=/library/en-us/dnmaj/html/aj2metrop.asp"&gt;Pat Helland's &amp;#8220;Metropolis&amp;#8220; article&lt;/A&gt;, &amp;#8220;we are at approximately the early 1880's in urban development in our parallel IT shop's growth!&amp;#8220;&amp;nbsp;I also like his explanation&amp;nbsp;of why&amp;nbsp;&amp;#8220;shared services will not be achieved by trying to put all of your applications on one version of one platform&amp;#8221;.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I'm going to use his material for my next series of discussions on &amp;#8220;why SOA&amp;#8220;. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Source: &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/steve_kirk/archive/2004/04/15/114290.aspx"&gt;Steve Kirk&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=116331" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>Activewords scripting guide in PDF</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/04/10/110807.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2004 05:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:110807</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/110807.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=110807</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I might actually figure out how to make this scripting stuff work! AW have recently released a guide &lt;A href="http://www.activewords.com/downloads/AWScriptingLanguage.pdf"&gt;in PDF format&lt;/A&gt;. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Source: &lt;A href="http://blogs.officezealot.com/marc/"&gt;Marc&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=110807" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>VoIP Now Available on Pocket PCs For Free </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/04/07/108864.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:108864</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/108864.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=108864</wfw:commentRss><description>This article on &lt;A href="http://www.bargainpda.com/default.asp?newsID=1987"&gt;Skype for Pocket PC&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;mentions that Skype was founded by the two guys who in vented Kazaa! That's news to me. Wow, talk about two guys changing paradigms... &lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=108864" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>Channel9 gets media coverage down under!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/04/07/108858.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 22:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:108858</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/108858.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=108858</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;FONT size=2&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Great to see &lt;A href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/0,2000061733,39144071,00.htm"&gt;ZDnet Australia&lt;/A&gt; giving &lt;A href="http://channel9.msdn.com/"&gt;Channel9 &lt;/A&gt;some early coverage!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=108858" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>a look under the covers of Gmail - Google's new email service</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/04/05/107600.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:107600</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/107600.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=107600</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I'm all excited reading &lt;A href="http://miscoranda.com/102"&gt;miscoranda's drill-down into Gmail&lt;/A&gt;. This is big. As big as OutlookMT, Scoble? I dunno. But it's big. Oh, I know, web mail is old hat. Yeah but so was &amp;#8220;search&amp;#8221; when Google jumped into the pond. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also laughing at &lt;A href="http://fury.com/article/1989.php"&gt;Kevin Fox's post &lt;/A&gt;assuring everyone Gmail wasn't an April Fools Day joke and about why he loves working at a company like Google. Hey Kevin - if you're looking for more testers... give me a yell!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Source: &lt;A href="http://weblogs.asp.net/pleloup/archive/2004/04/04/107442.aspx"&gt;http://weblogs.asp.net/pleloup/archive/2004/04/04/107442.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=107600" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>why migrate from Microsoft ASP to Microsoft .NET</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/04/05/107598.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:107598</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/107598.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=107598</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;A few months ago &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2003/12/24/45538.aspx"&gt;I linked to an article &lt;/A&gt;in a local paper which mentioned that one of Australia's largest e-tailers was still running on Microsoft ASP and SQL 7. Nothing at all wrong with that, as far as I'm concerned - plenty of businesses out there are happily running on even 20 year-old technology. The challenge for vendors, though, is to make the new technology compelling enough to create a business justification for organisations to upgrade their infrastructure. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today one of the developers at this e-tailer, Paul,&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2003/12/24/45538.aspx#107559"&gt;posted a comment &lt;/A&gt;making the point that &amp;#8220;any form of radical technology shift is going to require a pretty compelling business case to justify the expense (and, in the case of the SQL 7 -&amp;gt; SQL 2000 migration, it's a fairly enormous expense)&amp;#8220; and letting me know that they are &amp;#8220;doing pretty amazing things with the old technology&amp;#8220; and I'm sure he's right on this last point. The folks at &lt;A href="http://www.wishlist.com.au"&gt;Wishlist &lt;/A&gt;are a very smart bunch who have a great site and an even better business model. Let's face it - any &amp;#8220;dot com&amp;#8220; who survived the crunch are smarter than your average bear. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So anyway, I was wondering - what business justification have&amp;nbsp;other organisations have used to migrate from ASP to ASP.NET or from SQL7 to SQL 2000? Is it compelling enough? Do we need to do more to either make the new technology compelling or to communicate the more compelling features of the new technologies? Is it really to do with price?&amp;nbsp;Or with the cost and complexity of the migration?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=107598" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>Bungie announces HALO 2 product placement. Allegedly. </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/04/02/105930.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:05:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:105930</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/105930.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=105930</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT face=Verdana color=#000000 size=2&gt;Revealing a brand synergy unprecedented in next generation gaming, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href="http://halo.bungie.net/news/stories/halo-6EC4B4C1-2A23-4C7C-9ABD-5EB46973A253.html"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Verdana color=#000000 size=2&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Bungie today announced&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT face=Verdana color=#000000 size=2&gt; a list of vendors to be featured in-game in "Halo 2" the exciting sci-fi adventure heading to Xbox game systems this fall. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT face=Verdana&gt;&lt;FONT color=#000000&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Gee, I can&amp;#8217;t seem to find &amp;#8220;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Mungo McIver, a Microsoft marketing expert&amp;#8221; in the GAL. How about that&amp;#8230;. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=105930" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>newsflash: the internet is popular with Gen X &amp; Y</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/30/102162.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:102162</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/102162.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=102162</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I had a laugh to myself reading &lt;A href="http://www.mediapost.com/dtls_dsp_news.cfm?newsId=244052"&gt;this article&lt;/A&gt; today about&amp;nbsp;a&lt;SPAN class=mdntext&gt;&lt;FONT face=Times&gt; study conducted by the Online Publishers Association which analyzes the Internet habits of 18-to-34-year-olds, and guess what it found??&amp;nbsp;Gen X and Y have embraced the Web in a big way. Wow. No kidding. Humour aside, there are some good numbers in the report:&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN class=mdntext&gt;25 percent of this group sends or shares video via the Web, compared to 6 percent of all Internet users&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN class=mdntext&gt;42 percent burn downloaded music to CDs, versus 24 percent of all Internet users 18 and older&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN class=mdntext&gt;The 18-to-34-year-old demo turns to the Web for entertainment. In fact, 30 percent visit entertainment sites daily, compared to 32 percent who read newspaper entertainment sections and 19 percent who read entertainment magazines. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=mdntext&gt;I just make it into this demographic (turning 34 in October) and it isn't unusual for me to spend 18-20 hours a day in front of a PC (and therefore the web), so of course it's going to be an integral part of how I live, work and play but I guess this is still big news for some baby-boomers who didn't grow up with a PC in front of them (come to think of it, neither did I). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class=mdntext&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=102162" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>Playing around with Anagram</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/25/95223.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:95223</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/95223.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=95223</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;Thanks to &lt;A href="http://buzzmodo.typepad.com/buzzmodo/"&gt;Buzz &lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;who introduced me tonight to &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href="http://getanagram.com/"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;Anagram&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;. Anagram instantly and intelligently translates the meaningful text from any application into Outlook Contact, Calendar, Task and Note items. Great app! Just what I've needed for YEARS. The amount of time I spend cutting and pasting people's sig files into contacts... I hate to think! &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face=Arial&gt;I notice &lt;A href="http://www.shahine.com/omar/PermaLink,guid,aa736cc2-46b2-444e-b839-319080cd43ed.aspx"&gt;Omar's &lt;/A&gt;been talking about Outlook as a platform with Anagram as one example. And of course &lt;A href="http://blogs.officezealot.com/MT/mt-tb.cgi/318"&gt;Marc&lt;/A&gt; covered it a couple of weeks ago. Gee, I stop blogging for a couple of weeks and the world kept moving without me... &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=95223" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>the "Father" of Information Engineering</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/11/87592.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:87592</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/87592.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=87592</wfw:commentRss><description>Yesterday I had the distinct pleasure of meeting a living legend - &lt;A href="http://members.ozemail.com.au/~ieinfo/cbfindex.htm#Biography"&gt;Clive Finkelstein&lt;/A&gt;. Clive Finkelstein is acknowledged worldwide as the "Father" of &lt;A href="http://members.ozemail.com.au/~ieinfo/ieindex.htm"&gt;Information Engineering&lt;/A&gt;&lt;A href="http://members.ozemail.com.au/~ieinfo/ieindex.htm#IEHome"&gt; &lt;/A&gt;(IE), having developed its concepts from 1976 - 1980 based on original work carried out by him to bridge from strategic business planning to information systems. &lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;Many of his papers and some projects are available online at &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;SPAN style="COLOR: blue"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=MsoHyperlink&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ies.aust.com/~ieinfo/"&gt;http://www.ies.aust.com/~ieinfo/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt; I'd love to get Clive to speak at some Microsoft events. &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=87592" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>CIOs see increased IT spending: Gartner</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/11/87559.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:87559</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/87559.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=87559</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;A survey of 956 chief information officers around the world shows they are confident about increases in IT spending in 2004 but do not intend to increase spending until business shows a recovery, a unit of the technology research firm Gartner said in a report released today. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The survey found that the business priorities for CIOs were still security breaches, operating costs and data protection and privacy. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;Source: &lt;A href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/03/10/1078594405786.html"&gt;The Age&lt;/A&gt;&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=87559" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>Do kids blog?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/09/85870.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 08:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:85870</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>14</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/85870.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=85870</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://notgartner.com/posts/212.aspx"&gt;Mitch Denny asks&lt;/A&gt;: &lt;EM&gt;I wonder what would happen if we encouraged school students to keep an open log of their thoughts about their studies that was accessible to teachers and parents where they could ask questions. Parents and teachers could then read the blog entries to help identify ways to help the student learn.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And I was wondering, what % of school kids currently blog? Has anyone seen a stat (in Pew etc) that pulls out that stat? I can think of a bunch of reasons having kids blog would be a good thing. There was lots of crapola that&amp;nbsp;I went through as a kid which would have been good to communicate with someone outside of my immediate circle about. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=85870" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>Why do bloggers kill kittens?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/08/85815.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 05:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:85815</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/85815.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=85815</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;To find out why, jump over to &lt;A href="http://www-idl.hpl.hp.com/blogstuff/faq.html#10"&gt;the Blog Epidemic Analyzer FAQ at hp.com&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And just to prove I'm not a "Blog Vampire"... source: &lt;A href="http://www.wordsoup.com/word/archives/001375.html"&gt;Word Soup&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=85815" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>Microsoft's marketing</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/07/85405.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 05:37:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:85405</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/85405.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=85405</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.dylangreene.com/blog.asp?blogID=402"&gt;Dylan Greene on Windows 2003 Server&lt;/A&gt;: "&lt;EM&gt;I'm sure there's a bunch of other features we could be taking advantage of, but as usual&amp;nbsp; it seems that&amp;nbsp;Microsoft's marketing department would rather keep them a secret."&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which reminds me of a comment a colleague of mind in Sydney made to me after a couple of tequilas a few years ago. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;He said "Five years ago Microsoft had average products but great marketing. Today, we have great products but average marketing. The biggest problem is - people think it's still the other way around!" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know if I agree, but I'm glad Dylan's keeping us on our toes. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=85405" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item><item><title>I've been un-Googled</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/2004/03/07/85366.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2004 01:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:85366</guid><dc:creator>Removed=342783</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/comments/85366.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/commentrss.aspx?PostID=85366</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN: 0in; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; mso-outline-level: 1"&gt;I recently changed the title of my blog to improve my googlerank for the search "Microsoft blogger". And it worked... for a couple of days. I went from #40 to #4. And now? Apparently my blog&amp;nbsp;doesn't exist. If I google "microsoft blogger", Scoble is still there, Frankarr is still there, I am… nowhere. :-) What's up with that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=85366" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/cameronreilly/archive/tags/Consumer+Tech/default.aspx">Consumer Tech</category></item></channel></rss>