<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Imagine Think Create Share : Open Document Format</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/carloshm/archive/tags/Open+Document+Format/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Open Document Format</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Phrase of the week - ODF</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/carloshm/archive/2009/05/21/phrase-of-the-week-odf.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9633619</guid><dc:creator>carloshm</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/carloshm/comments/9633619.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/carloshm/commentrss.aspx?PostID=9633619</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;To the point: can you point me to where it is stated that validity to the manifest schema is a ODF conformance requirement? No, I don't think you can, because such a requirement does not exist. &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;A title="Notes on Document Conformance and Portability" href="http://adjb.net/post/Notes-on-Document-Conformance-and-Portability-4.aspx#id_dbba4bb0-22e6-4b6e-9755-8dd71c318b0c" mce_href="http://adjb.net/post/Notes-on-Document-Conformance-and-Portability-4.aspx#id_dbba4bb0-22e6-4b6e-9755-8dd71c318b0c"&gt;Rob Weir&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;- IBM / Chief ODF Architect&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Brilliant and simple answer&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;... I regard the schema as an equivalent case. It is a *grammar* which formally makes unambiguous formal provisions about the disposition of XML elements and attributes declared in a certain namespace. If the schema mandates that element x MUST contain element y, and an XML manifest makes use of element x but fails to use element y as mandated, then I say that document is as surely non-conformant as the one which disregards the ZIP format provisions mentioned above.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="Notes on Document Conformance and Portability" href="http://adjb.net/post/Notes-on-Document-Conformance-and-Portability-4.aspx#id_6dbc3401-4557-4a9f-b8d4-71181ccf718d" mce_href="http://adjb.net/post/Notes-on-Document-Conformance-and-Portability-4.aspx#id_6dbc3401-4557-4a9f-b8d4-71181ccf718d"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Alex Brown&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;nbsp;- &lt;/EM&gt;Griffin Brown Digital Publishing Ltd / Technical Director&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9633619" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/carloshm/archive/tags/Open+Document+Format/default.aspx">Open Document Format</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/carloshm/archive/tags/ODF/default.aspx">ODF</category></item></channel></rss>