Chris Burrows' Blog : November 2008

C# "dynamic," Part VI: We left off last time with this piece of code public class C { public static void M( int i) { } public static void M( string s) { } } ... dynamic d = GetSomeD(); C .M(d); ...together with some question about what the compiler could possibly do on the Read More...
Posted 14 November 08 02:20 by cburrows | 3 Comments
Filed under C#, dynamic
C# "dynamic," Part V: Let's look at this: dynamic d = null ; object o = d; // not an implicit conversion Last time , I said that the conversion on the second line is not an implicit conversion. If you know C# already, that sounds preposterous. Just look at it; of course it's Read More...
Posted 11 November 08 02:04 by cburrows | 3 Comments
Filed under C#, dynamic
C# "dynamic," Part IV: Today, let's geek out about the language design regarding the dynamic type. Type in the language vs. Type in the runtime One thing that lots of people already know is that when you say "dynamic" in code, you can think of it as "System.Object" Read More...
Posted 06 November 08 05:45 by cburrows | 5 Comments
Filed under C#, dynamic
Channel 9 Video on C# 4: I'm a little backlogged at work right now, and I'll get back to some dynamic posts as soon as I can. In the meantime, Eric , Sam , Mads , and I talked with Channel 9 last week, and the video has just been posted. I look forward to watching it myself! Read More...
Posted 01 November 08 12:27 by cburrows | 0 Comments
Filed under C#, dynamic

Chris Burrows' Blog