http://blogs.msdn.com/chrsmith/archive/2008/09/12/scripting-in-f.aspxThe thing you hear most about F# is that it is multi-paradigm , meaning that you can use it to code in multiple styles of programming. But F# spans multiple-domains too. F# is not only well suited for quantitative computing, but it is surprisingly wellen-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/chrsmith/archive/2008/09/12/scripting-in-f.aspx#8948118Fri, 12 Sep 2008 23:46:29 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8948118car insurance &raquo; Scripting in F#<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://hoursfunnywallpaper.cn/?p=5958">http://hoursfunnywallpaper.cn/?p=5958</a></p> http://blogs.msdn.com/chrsmith/archive/2008/09/12/scripting-in-f.aspx#8961905Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:17:42 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8961905Chris Smith's completely unique view<p>In a previous post I talked about how to take advantage of .FSX (F# Script) files to automate tasks for</p> http://blogs.msdn.com/chrsmith/archive/2008/09/12/scripting-in-f.aspx#8992062Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:18:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8992062grahamsw<p>Is loading scripts into other scripts really deprecated? I'm porting the code in &quot;Programming Collective Intelligence&quot; to F# just now, and am finding the flexibility of keeping everything interpreted invaluable. At the same time there is a lot of mix and match functionality that I am *not* going to keep typing. (Bad enough that everyone in the world has to write a function to do HTTP GETs, unforgivable to have to write it in every script.)</p> <p>Actually, it's all working pretty well so far, but I'd love to know what other people consider good practice when developing interactively. </p> <p>I *could* compile everything into DLLs, but this fluidity is a good thing. I'd be loathe to give it up. &nbsp; </p>