<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx</link><description>The Visual Studio Class Designer team is sad to announce that the Class Designer will not support the C++ language in the upcoming release of Visual Studio 2005. Late last week we were forced to make a very difficult decision, which we are relaying to</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C   language </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#384773</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 05:11:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:384773</guid><dc:creator>R.Ramesh's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#384789</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 21:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:384789</guid><dc:creator>Geoff Appleby</dc:creator><description>You've cut C++ but you support J#? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't get me wrong, I code in neither of those two languages, and it's a shame you had to cut it out.  But does anyone actually use J#? That's a wasted language, I always thought (yes, i realise i sound like an opinionated a-hole :)  But I would have put C++ priority over J#, and and cut J# to have more time to work on C++.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just my opnion :)</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#384800</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 21:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:384800</guid><dc:creator>RGab</dc:creator><description>well, supporting J# is almost the same as supporting C#. C++ has different problems, it is a lot more complex and allows more complex architectures that are probably a lot harder to visualize and keep in synch. Anyway, I won't miss it but it would've been probably nice to support it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Btw, was unmanged C++ ever planned to support or just managed c++?</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#384809</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 21:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:384809</guid><dc:creator>John Stallo</dc:creator><description>RGab is spot on - in supporting C# and VB, J# sort of almost came for free.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To answer your question, RGab, we had planned on supporting both native and managed C++ features.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#384814</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:384814</guid><dc:creator>Apolon</dc:creator><description>Bummer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Given the complexity of C++ reverse engineering compared to the simpler/cleaner languages such as C#, VB.NET and J# this is understandable. I hope support for C++ in the class designer is added as some form of service pack to VS.NET 2005 in the future (and not in VS.NET 2007, 2008 or whatever the next version will be).</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#385005</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 05:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:385005</guid><dc:creator>Christian Mogensen</dc:creator><description>Bummer - this means we won't be using CD, and sticking with Rational XDE instead then.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We were really looking forward to getting a nice, easy-to-use design surface for our C++ code.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#385071</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:385071</guid><dc:creator>Clay</dc:creator><description>I think that this is very unfornate. In dev shops where you have a mix of languages such as C++, C# and VB you will see a delay in adoption of your new tools as a standard. Larger groups like to standerdize on one tool set. In addtion if you are like us and are in the process of developing mixed systems (C++/ATL legacy with C# addtions) things get muddled. I guess we will need to revisit IBM’s Rational XDE for the near term. I really liked what had been done so far it’s just too bad we will have to wait another couple of years. To be honest I would rather have some limited capablities in regards to C++ rather than nothing at all. </description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#385084</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 09:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:385084</guid><dc:creator>Prashanth</dc:creator><description>Yesterday I was at an MSDN event and saw a demo of the Class Designer. My first question was &amp;quot;Is C++ and Native code supported?&amp;quot;. The presenter was not sure and asked me to check MSDN. Guess I dont have to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We were looking forward to replace the Rational Suite. Guess that wont happen soon.</description></item><item><title>RE: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#385132</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2005 10:35:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:385132</guid><dc:creator>clintmiller@beckgroup.com (Clint Miller)</dc:creator><description>This is really sad to hear.  I hope that the VSCD team will reconsider this decision.  Lots of shops are mixed language, mine included.</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio 2005 Class Designerは残念ながらC++未対応</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#385300</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 20:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:385300</guid><dc:creator>中の技術日誌ブログ</dc:creator><description>Visual Studio 2005 Class Designerは残念ながらC++未対応</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#386140</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:386140</guid><dc:creator>jm dessaintes</dc:creator><description>Very, very, very sad...</description></item><item><title>Interesting finds this morning</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#386150</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:386150</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description>Interesting finds this morning</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#392022</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:392022</guid><dc:creator>TommySwede</dc:creator><description>A couple of years ago, Microsoft would NOT have released a new major version of Visual Studio without proper support for C++.&lt;br&gt;Now, this is the first clear indication that C++ is not #1 at Microsoft anymore. No matter what Herb Sutter and other says...&lt;br&gt;You know, it is not what you say but what you do that counts.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#392406</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:392406</guid><dc:creator>Rakesh Namineni</dc:creator><description>The VC team made a very sincere effort to support our (Class Designer Team) requirements. Their devs worked hard with us. But due to unforseen events they were in a state where they had to reshuffle resources and make some hard decisions to deliver a solid robust VC product. It is a hard decision but from customers point of view that team is doing everything in their possible limits to make C++ experience in VS grand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is a good synergy of tools among different languages in VS and there is room to improve as well. We will strive hard to close the gap.</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#394347</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:394347</guid><dc:creator>Bill Dunlap</dc:creator><description>Hi guys.  I'm the product manager for Visual C++ and would like to address this as well.  VC++ is absolutely essential to MS and our goal is - and always has been - to provide a first class development experience for our customers.  It sucks when a feature has to be cut, but anyone who writes software for a living has had to make these types of decisions.  Quality is a feature...and shipping is a feature.  VB, C#, and J# essentially came as a package while C++ is a bigger beast.  We didn't make it into the timeframe this cycle, but we will for the next one.  </description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#398386</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:398386</guid><dc:creator>A C++ Developer</dc:creator><description>Bill Dunlap wrote:&lt;br&gt;&amp;gt; We didn't make it into the timeframe this cycle, but we will for the next one.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other words: we will force you to upgrade (and pay!) twice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am almost as thrilled about this decision as I was about the omission of call-graph and caller-graph from VS 7 and 7.1&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#400423</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:400423</guid><dc:creator>Unsatisfied Customer</dc:creator><description>That means we're looking forward to the next release of Borland's C++ Builder</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#403700</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 07:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:403700</guid><dc:creator>HenrikV</dc:creator><description>Since C++ is a standard, microsofts goal is to move development to proprietary languages like VB, C# etc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I really like VC++ 2003 compiler! Is there *any* reason to upgrade? I'd rather spend money on some Mac hardware and start writing a new UI for my apps.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#404074</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 07:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:404074</guid><dc:creator>Stefán Jökull</dc:creator><description>HenrikV:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I thought C# was a standard too ;)</description></item><item><title>re: Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not support the C++ language</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#404092</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 08:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:404092</guid><dc:creator>Brent Newbury</dc:creator><description>Like people are saying; it's sucks when highly anticipated features have to be cut. But, they are cut for a reason.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Right now people are bummed out because they don't know what's going to happen from now on. Will Microsoft ever impliment Class Designer for VC++? Will it be in the next version (which I have to pay extra)?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I understand that to have a product ship on time you have to have tradeoffs (can I have the tradeoff triangle sounding in the distance?). What I would suggest is that Microsoft ship Visual Studio 2005 without VC++ Class Designer support and later, when the feature is complete, release it as a free upgrade to Visual Studio with a &amp;quot;sorry it's late, but it's finally here&amp;quot; line.</description></item><item><title>Why does Microsoft treat C   as a second class citizen?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#423364</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:423364</guid><dc:creator>Tales from a Trading Desk</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>[Humeur] Un Visual Studio 8.1 en 2006 ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#423383</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 13:23:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:423383</guid><dc:creator>Patrice 's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>[Humeur] Un Visual Studio 8.1 en 2006 ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#423384</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 13:26:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:423384</guid><dc:creator>Patrice 's Blog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title> ClassDesigner s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not | Paid Surveys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/classdesigner/archive/2005/03/04/384764.aspx#9654259</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:33:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9654259</guid><dc:creator> ClassDesigner s WebLog Visual Studio 2005 Class Designer will not | Paid Surveys</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=classdesigner-s-weblog-visual-studio-2005-class-designer-will-not"&gt;http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=classdesigner-s-weblog-visual-studio-2005-class-designer-will-not&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>