<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Announcement: New Tool to Auto-Generate Add-In Pipelines [Jesse Kaplan]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clraddins/archive/2008/01/09/announcement-new-tool-to-auto-generate-add-in-pipelines-jesse-kaplan.aspx</link><description>This has been one of the most requested features we've had since people started learning more about our model and playing with the bits and I'm very happy to announce that we have published this on CodePlex: http://www.codeplex.com/clraddins/Wiki/View.aspx?title=Pipeline%20Builder</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Announcement: New Tool to Auto-Generate Add-In Pipelines [Jesse Kaplan]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clraddins/archive/2008/01/09/announcement-new-tool-to-auto-generate-add-in-pipelines-jesse-kaplan.aspx#7077202</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:48:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7077202</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Kerr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like the idea of having it on CodePlex to make it easier for you to do updates. Putting the latest samples on CodePlex was a nice move as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Announcement: New Tool to Auto-Generate Add-In Pipelines [Jesse Kaplan]</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clraddins/archive/2008/01/09/announcement-new-tool-to-auto-generate-add-in-pipelines-jesse-kaplan.aspx#8671257</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:19:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8671257</guid><dc:creator>cokkiy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;How to use it?When I install it on a computer running Vista &amp;nbsp;and &amp;nbsp;VS2008 chs Team version,I can't see anything in tool menu item about it.So from where I can use it?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interfaces vs abstract classes in views</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clraddins/archive/2008/01/09/announcement-new-tool-to-auto-generate-add-in-pipelines-jesse-kaplan.aspx#8841352</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:13:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8841352</guid><dc:creator>Anthony Kilhoffer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have seen examples that use either abstract classes or interfaces in the host and add in views. My question is, is it possible to use an interface on the host view and an abstract class on the add in view? I would like to implement common functionality for the add ins, but don't want to carry that logic into the host. Is this possible?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>