<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What's in NetFX 3.5 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clrcodegeneration/archive/2008/08/15/what-s-in-netfx-3-5-sp1.aspx</link><description>Long time, no blog. Since the NetFX 3.5 Service Pack is available, now, I figured I’d put up a quick rundown of what we (the CLR CodeGen team) contributed to the package. I’m not going into nitty-gritty details, but just to give you an idea of what’s</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: What's in NetFX 3.5 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clrcodegeneration/archive/2008/08/15/what-s-in-netfx-3-5-sp1.aspx#8871641</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:33:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8871641</guid><dc:creator>Tanveer Badar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;About this line: 'The x86 JIT has dramatically improved inlining heuristics that result in generally better code quality, and, in particular, much lower “cost of abstraction”'.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you mean to say this &amp;quot;no-inlining-functions-having-valuetype-parameters-issue&amp;quot; has been fixed, or somehow has a lesser impact in .netfx 3.5 sp1 (big name!) CLR?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: What's in NetFX 3.5 SP1?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clrcodegeneration/archive/2008/08/15/what-s-in-netfx-3-5-sp1.aspx#8872007</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 20:51:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8872007</guid><dc:creator>alexey_r</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Badar: it is described at the &amp;quot;inlining heuristics&amp;quot; link.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;wrap the thing in a struct, expect similar performance to code that explicitly uses an integer&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So far as it isn't a class field, right (based on your last post)? Or has this changed?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Overview of CLR improvements in the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clrcodegeneration/archive/2008/08/15/what-s-in-netfx-3-5-sp1.aspx#8931714</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:21:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8931714</guid><dc:creator>Blake Niemyjski</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Below is a list of all the sweet improvements made to the .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 since the&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>在.NET Framework 3.5 SP1中CLR的更新</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/clrcodegeneration/archive/2008/08/15/what-s-in-netfx-3-5-sp1.aspx#8945970</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:03:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8945970</guid><dc:creator>Joycode@Ab110.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;【原文地址】 CLR Updates in .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 【原文发表日期】 19 August 08 07:57 Kevin Frie ，CLR核心部分的开发主管最近发布了一篇帖子&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>