http://blogs.msdn.com/craigfr/archive/2007/06/12/query-failure-with-read-uncommitted.aspxOver the past month or so, I've looked at pretty much every isolation level except for read uncommitted or nolock. Today I'm going to wrap up this series of posts with a discussion of read uncommitted. Plenty has already been written about the dangersenCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/craigfr/archive/2007/06/12/query-failure-with-read-uncommitted.aspx#4728076Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:08:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4728076David Egerton’s WebLog » Read-only data<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.clarience.com/davide/?p=9">http://blogs.clarience.com/davide/?p=9</a></p> http://blogs.msdn.com/craigfr/archive/2007/06/12/query-failure-with-read-uncommitted.aspx#6802772Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:43:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6802772Developer journal<p>Ошибка, которая может возникнуть при использовании хинта NOLOCK - нечастая ситуация, но тем не менее...</p>