<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>MSDN and TechNet Search: now more refined...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cslemp/archive/2008/11/24/msdn-and-technet-search-now-more-refined.aspx</link><description>Several months ago, we did a deep-dive on MSDN and TechNet search with a dozen users . They were generally impressed, but had some feedback on a few items. We've addressed several of their concerns and more, so I wanted to outline what's better now...</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: MSDN and TechNet Search: now more refined...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/cslemp/archive/2008/11/24/msdn-and-technet-search-now-more-refined.aspx#9180614</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:44:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9180614</guid><dc:creator>cslemp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris here... Using our search term analytics tools, I see that the day after this post there was a spike in searches on &amp;quot;search msdn with live search&amp;quot;... I'll take that as a compliment on this post :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>