Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Why 100% hardware RAID is best

Everyone knows software RAID is slower and because of this most RAID installations are using hardware RAID controllers. But most RAID controllers require special software drivers. And in many cases, that is just the start of your troubles. I just built my system with a transparent RAID controller requiring no software. Here is why I chose this specifcially and when you should consider this too. It is not the best in all cases as often the hardware software combos can offer other features, but especially in workstations transparent hardware shoudl strongly be considered. More
Published Sunday, August 13, 2006 1:25 PM by Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

Sunday, August 13, 2006 9:33 PM by afsina

# re: Why 100% hardware RAID is best

have you ever heard of Raid-Z and ZFS?

http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/bonwick?entry=raid_z
Wednesday, August 16, 2006 5:04 AM by Chad Z. Hower aka Kudzu

# re: Why 100% hardware RAID is best

Interesting, but would still not be appropriate to my case. No matter how efficient the software, software is a week link in restores, and especially recovery and multi booting. I needed a hardware only solution.

Also he makes some valid points, but he also omits the weaknesses. It may be only 700 lines of code, but it depends on the file system adding a whole layer of complexity. If anything happens to the FS, you cannot recover your RAID data, and there are other such issues introduced by introducing such a huge additional external factor.

That being said, in some applications it certainly looks useful

Leave a Comment

(required) 
required 
(required) 

  
Enter Code Here: Required
 
Page view tracker