<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Moving from CVS or SVN (Subversion) to TFS (Visual STudio Team Foundation Server) ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dannawi/archive/2009/06/23/moving-from-cvs-or-svn-subversion-to-tfs.aspx</link><description>Best of breed open source solution will not help you in supporting the best practices when building application software. Even if you invest a lot of time (and money), you will only acheive a minimum level of integration (source control and project management</description><dc:language>fr-FR</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Moving from CVS or SVN (Subversion) to TFS (Visual STudio Team Foundation Server) ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dannawi/archive/2009/06/23/moving-from-cvs-or-svn-subversion-to-tfs.aspx#9823366</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:57:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9823366</guid><dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Quote: &amp;quot;Not because CVS or SVN is not doing a good job for source control management but because they need to integrate all the components (and tools) used but the application development team.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yep, that could be a good reason. The interoperation/integration between those free tools are not so good and suits everybody's needs. But for small organizations, TF is quite huge and expensive. That's also a problem,&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Moving from CVS or SVN (Subversion) to TFS (Visual STudio Team Foundation Server) ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dannawi/archive/2009/06/23/moving-from-cvs-or-svn-subversion-to-tfs.aspx#9827036</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:08:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9827036</guid><dc:creator>Josho</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously? Please get us better Git or Perforce support before you worry about CVS deployments.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Moving from CVS or SVN (Subversion) to TFS (Visual STudio Team Foundation Server) ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dannawi/archive/2009/06/23/moving-from-cvs-or-svn-subversion-to-tfs.aspx#9827058</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:18:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9827058</guid><dc:creator>Dannawi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;answer to the first comment :&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* integration between open source solution is at the cost of your time and will regidify your process&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* Team Foundation Server for 5 developers is about 8 000 $. what is your cost per day for your time or your developers ? 1k , up to 2k ? do you think you will spend more than 5 to 6 days to build the integration or do the manual reporting ? if yes ... TFS is much more cheaper and agile &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Moving from CVS or SVN (Subversion) to TFS (Visual STudio Team Foundation Server) ?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dannawi/archive/2009/06/23/moving-from-cvs-or-svn-subversion-to-tfs.aspx#9827061</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:20:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9827061</guid><dc:creator>Dannawi</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;answer to the second comment:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the concept of TFS is to have one main repository. So the idea is to replace perforce (and others) with TFS&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>