RE: One parameter to rule them all: Part 2

re: RE: One parameter to rule them all: Part 2

Matt Berther — Tue, 30 Nov 2004 09:53:00 GMT

I might be wrong, but ASMX does not allow overloads, do they?

If this is true, this would be a compelling argument for the "uber-parameter".

re: RE: One parameter to rule them all: Part 2

adeering — Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:55:00 GMT

However, the first example would be more like a RPC call which is also something to be avoided. It has been preached that each request should be treated as a message or document and not like an RPC call.

Wow, so it has been 2.5 years already

Don Smith (dev4net) — Wed, 01 Dec 2004 05:45:00 GMT

Versioning Web Service Parameters

Don Smith — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:10:00 GMT

Versioning Web Service Parameters

Don Smith (dev4net) — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:10:00 GMT

Versioning Web Services

Kirk Allen Evans' Blog — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:23:00 GMT

re: RE: One parameter to rule them all: Part 2

AIM48 — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:51:00 GMT

I don't think RPC calls are all bad - in many situations you need to go the RPC route (for example a temperture web site - you can't tell the user - Ok we have submited your request - please log back on in about 2 minutes and we should have the answer for you then) rather the procedue call is an integral part of the process - if the procedure dosn't go thru then we have to stop the process.

RE:Versioning Web Service Parameters

Dare Obasanjo's WebLog — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:20:00 GMT

Dare Obasanjo s WebLog RE One parameter to rule them all Part 2 | Outdoor Decor

Dare Obasanjo s WebLog RE One parameter to rule them all Part 2 | Outdoor Decor — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:15:42 GMT

PingBack from http://outdoordecoration.info/story.php?id=2015