<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Automated testing or manual testing? </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dave_froslie/archive/2007/12/03/automated-testing-or-manual-testing.aspx</link><description>One of the great debates in the Software Test Engineering world involves the optimal mix of automated testing and manual testing. Like all good debates in software engineering, there are the religious fanatics that position themselves at either end of</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Automated testing or manual testing? </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dave_froslie/archive/2007/12/03/automated-testing-or-manual-testing.aspx#6647143</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 23:25:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6647143</guid><dc:creator>TheCPUIWizard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;An excellent article!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To summarize (in my own words). Use &amp;quot;automation&amp;quot;/&amp;quot;tools&amp;quot; to facilitate the development of tests which require &amp;quot;human&amp;quot; insight. Do not burden the human with doing the mechanical repetative portions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A philosophy that applies to MANY different disciplines, not just testing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>