<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Team Foundation Server...it's more platform than product!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx</link><description>So ( there&amp;rsquo;s that word again! ) most of us are pretty convinced that Team Foundation Server is a pretty solid SDLC product, but I thought I would list some of the elements that appeals to non-devs. Integration: To me, integration has the ability</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Team Foundation Server&amp;#8230;it&amp;#8217;s more platform than product! &amp;raquo; Wagalulu - Microsoft &amp;raquo;   &amp;raquo; Team Foundation Server&amp;#8230;it&amp;#8217;s more platform than product!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx#669129</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 05:51:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:669129</guid><dc:creator>Team Foundation Server…it’s more platform than product! » Wagalulu - Microsoft »   » Team Foundation Server…it’s more platform than product!</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://microsoft.wagalulu.com/2006/07/17/team-foundation-serverits-more-platform-than-product/"&gt;http://microsoft.wagalulu.com/2006/07/17/team-foundation-serverits-more-platform-than-product/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Team System: A Platform for Software Development Innovation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx#669865</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:13:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:669865</guid><dc:creator>Rob Caron</dc:creator><description>David Lempher's recent blog post (Team Foundation Server...it's more platform than product!) reminded...</description></item><item><title>Team System: A Platform for Software Development Innovation &amp;raquo; Wagalulu - Microsoft &amp;raquo;   &amp;raquo; Team System: A Platform for Software Development Innovation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx#669875</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:20:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:669875</guid><dc:creator>Team System: A Platform for Software Development Innovation » Wagalulu - Microsoft »   » Team System: A Platform for Software Development Innovation</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://microsoft.wagalulu.com/2006/07/18/team-system-a-platform-for-software-development-innovation/"&gt;http://microsoft.wagalulu.com/2006/07/18/team-system-a-platform-for-software-development-innovation/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Team Foundation Server...it's more platform than product!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx#670246</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:31:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:670246</guid><dc:creator>Nick Randolph</dc:creator><description>Dave, great post about a fantastic product. &amp;nbsp;But have you looked at the pricing for TFS? &amp;nbsp;Given that TFS is currently not included in the MS partner program (AFAIK) RRP for TFS is approx $5900 + approx $1000 per seat? &amp;nbsp;For a smallish dev teams (ie around 6-10 seats) this pricing is ridiculous for the functionality. &amp;nbsp;We recently decided to go with Gemini and SourceSafe as a much cheaper (approx $280 US with no per seat cost). &amp;nbsp;Yes we loose a bit of functionality, but definitely not enough to warrent the extra cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other significant point is that because we don't have a per seat cost we can expose our Gemini interface to everyone else in the org, as well as customers (if we so desired).</description></item><item><title>re: Team Foundation Server...it's more platform than product!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx#670629</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 08:53:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:670629</guid><dc:creator>Mitch Denny</dc:creator><description>Partnership pays. We are a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner with competencies in Custom Development as such we get a whole bunch of Team Developer licenses with a Standard Server license for Team Foundation Server.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mind you - getting access to that entitlement out of the partner program can be so big a challenge that its easier to drop the dosh :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Something needs to be done about the delivery of TFS across the various channels actually.</description></item><item><title>VSTS Links - 07/19/2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx#671706</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 21:47:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:671706</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>Dylan Smith on Database Unit Testing - Not quite there yet…&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David L. on Team Foundation Server…it's...</description></item><item><title>notgartner  &amp;raquo; Blog Archive   &amp;raquo; DEV316: Extending Team Foundation Server</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/07/18/669120.aspx#696966</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 04:34:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:696966</guid><dc:creator>notgartner  » Blog Archive   » DEV316: Extending Team Foundation Server</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://notgartner.wordpress.com/2006/08/13/dev316-extending-team-foundation-server/"&gt;http://notgartner.wordpress.com/2006/08/13/dev316-extending-team-foundation-server/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>