<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Better Code through Chunking!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/09/20/762932.aspx</link><description>I'm on a plane en route to Perth, and have just finished reading an article in Scientific American called "The Expert Mind". Essentially it discusses a theory employed by chess masters called Chunking, where instead of seeing a board as being made up</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Better Code through Chunking!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/09/20/762932.aspx#762941</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 05:04:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:762941</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>Isn't this kind of like &amp;quot;Design Patterns&amp;quot;?</description></item><item><title>re: Better Code through Chunking!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/09/20/762932.aspx#763040</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 06:37:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:763040</guid><dc:creator>davidlem</dc:creator><description>Not really, design patterns are about applying a template approach to a problem. My concept is about learning code patterns (actual blocks of syntax) and then tweaking them to accomodate for different problems. Almost like code snippets but inside your head!</description></item><item><title>re: Better Code through Chunking!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/09/20/762932.aspx#763071</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:07:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:763071</guid><dc:creator>JosephCooney</dc:creator><description>these &amp;quot;chunks&amp;quot; sound a lot like GoF design patterns. Chess players obviously have a shared vocabulary for describing positions on the board, similar to what design patterns give developers? &amp;quot;singleton flyweight factory decorator&amp;quot; probably sounds equally amusing to chess players.</description></item><item><title>re: Better Code through Chunking!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/09/20/762932.aspx#763076</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 07:17:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:763076</guid><dc:creator>davidlem</dc:creator><description>The idea behind chunking though, is not to apply a pattern approach to solving a problem, it's to train yourself to act in a predictable way when presented with a problem. It's about subconsciously training developers to write bug free code from their fingers to the IDE. Patters are great for solving a problem using a consistent approach, but I can still code a bug while following a pattern.</description></item><item><title>Divide and Conquer &amp;laquo; notgartner</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/09/20/762932.aspx#764683</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2006 17:47:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:764683</guid><dc:creator>Divide and Conquer « notgartner</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://notgartner.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/divide-and-conquer/"&gt;http://notgartner.wordpress.com/2006/09/21/divide-and-conquer/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Debugging your Consultants!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/davidlem/archive/2006/09/20/762932.aspx#773270</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:18:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:773270</guid><dc:creator>David L's Blog</dc:creator><description>I caught up with Daz and Mitch yesterday for a quick coffee and chin wag while both Readifians were illin'...</description></item></channel></rss>