http://blogs.msdn.com/ddperf/archive/2009/06/09/parallel-scalability-isn-t-child-s-play-part-3-the-problem-with-fine-grained-parallelism.aspxIn the last blog entry in this series , I introduced the model for parallel program scalability proposed by Neil Gunther, which I praised for being a realistic antidote to more optimistic, but better known, formulas. Gunther’s model adds a new parameteren-USCommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)http://blogs.msdn.com/ddperf/archive/2009/06/09/parallel-scalability-isn-t-child-s-play-part-3-the-problem-with-fine-grained-parallelism.aspx#9718405Tue, 09 Jun 2009 23:35:46 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9718405Developer Division Performance Engineering blog : Parallel Scalability Isn???t Child???s Play, Part 2: Amdahl???s Law vs. Gunther???s Law<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/ddperf/archive/2009/04/29/parallel-scalability-isn-t-child-s-play-part-2-amdahl-s-law-vs-gunther-s-law.aspx">http://blogs.msdn.com/ddperf/archive/2009/04/29/parallel-scalability-isn-t-child-s-play-part-2-amdahl-s-law-vs-gunther-s-law.aspx</a></p>