<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Updated binary formats documentation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2008/06/30/updated-binary-formats-documentation.aspx</link><description>We have announced today the release of version 1.0 of technical documentation for a variety of protocols used by Office, SharePoint and Exchange. this brings the total amount of protocol documentation available for free download on MSDN to about 50,000</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>a-foton &amp;raquo; Updated binary formats documentation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2008/06/30/updated-binary-formats-documentation.aspx#8672250</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:27:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8672250</guid><dc:creator>a-foton &amp;raquo; Updated binary formats documentation</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.a-foton.ru/2008/06/updated-binary-formats-documentation/"&gt;http://blog.a-foton.ru/2008/06/updated-binary-formats-documentation/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Looking for some good reading on Open XML?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2008/06/30/updated-binary-formats-documentation.aspx#8672408</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:55:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8672408</guid><dc:creator>Brian Jones: Open XML Formats</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, can't believe it's been over a month since my last post. I've been pretty busy getting back into&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Updated binary formats documentation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2008/06/30/updated-binary-formats-documentation.aspx#8675644</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:55:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8675644</guid><dc:creator>Rebentisch</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds very promising. However, many experts say that the documentation tends to be incomplete and I am not sure that can be blamed on your company in any way. Is there any kind of &amp;quot;forensic&amp;quot; project which tries to document legacy formats and interact with external users of the documentation (feedback/qa)? I personally made good experiences with usage of team wikis to document legacy stuff. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Then another annoyance of documentation users is that MSDN documentation tends to disappear or CMS links get changed. Does Microsoft provide any solutions to make its documentation more &amp;quot;www-ready&amp;quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Third, the patent licensing terms OSP need some honest rethinking and analysis to ensure better market confidence. We know that patent indemnification is a new field of private law with not enough &amp;quot;testing&amp;quot;. A South African standards person wrote me today: &amp;quot;The matter of legal tools being in their infancy is significant. To a certain extent we can see things like the OSP as an experiment in this area. &amp;nbsp;Unfortunately I have not seen anything robust enough as yet to be taken seriously. &amp;nbsp;Including the OSP or other covenants and promises.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>