<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Open XML developers: where to get answers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2009/07/09/open-xml-developers-where-to-get-answers.aspx</link><description>I recently returned from a long business trip, and while working through my email backlog I’ve come across several questions from developers who are working with the Open XML formats.&amp;#160; I’ve responded to each of them with some tips on how to best</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Open XML developers: where to get answers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2009/07/09/open-xml-developers-where-to-get-answers.aspx#9833545</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:29:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9833545</guid><dc:creator>Mitch 74</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Doug,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just by curiosity, were the changes made to Open XML in IS 29500 backported to ECMA 376? As far as I know, there were like a thousand of them, and they were not all typo corrections... So?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, if these two are still different (I think there is work under way to make ECMA 376 and a relaxed IS 29500 compatible or something), which is supported in Office 2010, and which is default?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mitch&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Open XML developers: where to get answers</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2009/07/09/open-xml-developers-where-to-get-answers.aspx#9846748</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:30:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9846748</guid><dc:creator>dmahugh</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mitch, sorry for the delayed response -- I'm just now cleaning out my overflowing in-box ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Office 2010 supports IS29500. &amp;nbsp;As for the changes between ECMA-376 and IS29500, the way that's working is that Ecma has published ECMA-376 2nd Edition, which is equivalent to IS29500:2008. &amp;nbsp;So the original ECMA-376 is 1st Edition, then 2nd Edition is aligned with the first version of IS29500. &amp;nbsp;After there is a revision to IS29500 (as part of the ongoing maintenance process), Ecma will most likely publish a 3rd Edition that aligns with it, although that decision can't actually be taken by the Ecma General Assembly until an IS29500 revision is published by ISO/IEC.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>