David Ornstein's WebLog

I'm a Lead Program Manager in the Digital Documents group at Microsoft; we're part of the Windows team.

What have I learned so far using GTD?

Well, I haven't spent any time writing Outlook add-ins as I'd imagined.  Instead, here's something positive and something nagative from my experiences so far with Getting Things Done and the Outlook add-in:

On the plus side:

  • Contexts are great.  Putting things onto a todo list and pre-categorizing them based on the context in which you want to do them is great.  This is super helpful.  When I have a few quiet hours in the morning, I can do the things that require concentration.  When I'm between meetings or only have a few minutes free here or there, I can work on lots of those thigns that take 5-15 minutes.  For me, I've created two key contexts that I use for work @small and @medium.  @small things are the ones I can do really anytime (when I'm at a computer -- which is almost all the time I want to be actually working).  @medium ones are the ones that take more then 5-10 minutes.  Those I actually try to schedule onto my calendar into slots that don't have meetings.  I've just started this new approach (using TaskLine to lay out the tasks automatically for me).  We'll see if it actually works.

On the negative side:

  • Lower priority items can drift forever.  This is one of the things that I wanted to solve when I started using GTD.  The basic problem I have is that something gets assigned a low priority when I put it on my todo list.  And it really is low compared to other stuff.  Then I work on my high-pri items all the time.  And I have enough high and medium-pri stuff to do that I never get to the low priorities.  Which is fine and appropriate for a few days or even a week.  But sometimes these things just keep slipping out forever.  Very bad.  Maybe some way to raise the priority of things as they age?
Published Saturday, July 10, 2004 12:54 PM by dornstein
Filed under:

Comments

 

Phil Weber said:

Hi, David: Take a look at Life Balance from Llamagraphics (http://www.llamagraphics.com). It handles the "low priority item slippage" problem nicely.
July 10, 2004 2:53 PM
 

David Ornstein said:

I looked at Life Balance, but the lack of integration with Outlook kills it for me. I live and die by Outlook and the integration I have with the GTD add-in.

Now if I could just get the kinds of smart features in Life Balance integrated in somehow with GTD... :-)
July 10, 2004 2:56 PM
 

Sathyaish Chakravarthy said:

I've been maintaining to-do lists since I was in 12th standard in 1992-93. Earlier, I was adherant to the list by the hour. It's been over 11 years now and the effectiveness of to-do lists has seen some swings both ways. My conclusion is that implementation is what matters at the end of the day. We need to keep pushing ourselves to fill in small gaps of time with those little ones that you say get delayed for eternity. Do it NOW, if it is on the list, or it's never gonna get done.
July 23, 2004 6:39 AM
 

What have I learned so far using GTD? said:

November 27, 2007 6:44 PM
 

David Ornstein s WebLog What have I learned so far using GTD | Hammock Stand said:

June 1, 2009 3:16 PM
 

David Ornstein s WebLog What have I learned so far using GTD | Hammock Stand said:

June 3, 2009 12:19 AM
 

David Ornstein s WebLog What have I learned so far using GTD | porch swing said:

June 19, 2009 3:40 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Syndication

News

Welcome to my blog. I am David Ornstein and I work at Microsoft. You're probably here either because you know me and are interested in what I'm up to or you want to find out more about FlexWiki, the wiki implementation I (and a few others) wrote.


© 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Use  |  Trademarks  |  Privacy Statement
Microsoft
Page view tracker