<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Asynchronous or Synchronous Replication..?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/douggowans/archive/2008/12/12/asynchronous-or-synchronous-replication.aspx</link><description>One of the fundamental decisions that you might make in the early stages of an Exchange Server 2007 design is whether you favour the use of asynchronous or synchronous replication of Exchange Server data, particularly if you require data centre resilience.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title> Dougs Blog Exchange Server daily Asynchronous or Synchronous | work from home</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/douggowans/archive/2008/12/12/asynchronous-or-synchronous-replication.aspx#9761658</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:41:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9761658</guid><dc:creator> Dougs Blog Exchange Server daily Asynchronous or Synchronous | work from home</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://workfromhomecareer.info/story.php?id=8335"&gt;http://workfromhomecareer.info/story.php?id=8335&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>