<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Controlling the Synchronization Context</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2006/11/28/controlling-the-synchronization-context.aspx</link><description>The synchronization context is invisible state that flows around making sure that the proper threading model is being used with requests. Windows Forms applications, for example, require that calls be made on a particular thread and the synchronization</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Mixing Message Contract Attributes</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2006/11/28/controlling-the-synchronization-context.aspx#1166374</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 20:30:51 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1166374</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Allen's Indigo Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What's wrong with the following code? The error message when you try this is better than it used to be&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 129 </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2006/11/28/controlling-the-synchronization-context.aspx#1166703</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:34:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1166703</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Workflow/BPM/WCF/SOA David Chappell presents arguments both pro and con as to whether Microsoft qualifies&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 129 </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2006/11/28/controlling-the-synchronization-context.aspx#6739955</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 02:45:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6739955</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Workflow/BPM/WCF/SOA David Chappell presents arguments both pro and con as to whether Microsoft qualifies&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>New and Notable 129</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2006/11/28/controlling-the-synchronization-context.aspx#9171123</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:17:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9171123</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile's Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Workflow/BPM/WCF/SOA David Chappell presents arguments both pro and con as to whether Microsoft qualifies as a BPM vendor. Personally, I think the answer is yes, especially when WF is intergrated into BizTalk 200x and other products. Nicholas Allan continues&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>