<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Differences in Guid Serialization</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2008/01/31/differences-in-guid-serialization.aspx</link><description>Why do the guids in my contract turn into strings when generating a client? You're probably mixing different types of serializers between the client and service. There's nothing wrong with this and the generated client will work correctly but you don't</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Finding Data in Client Certificates</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2008/01/31/differences-in-guid-serialization.aspx#7354014</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 20:25:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7354014</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Allen's Indigo Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Can I pass additional user data, such as identity information, in a message secured with a client certificate?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Differences in Guid Serialization</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2008/01/31/differences-in-guid-serialization.aspx#7358129</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:41:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7358129</guid><dc:creator>kevinowen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I think there is a problem with the xs:pattern used for the &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/:guid"&gt;http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/:guid&lt;/a&gt; type. In XML Schema, the &amp;quot;\d&amp;quot; multi-character excape translates to &amp;quot;\p{Nd}&amp;quot;, which matches any character with a Unicode General Category of &amp;quot;Nd&amp;quot;. This is much more permissive than System.Guid. The problem with this is that the following are all valid guids according to the pattern, but none of them can be deserialized as System.Guid:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧-٨٩۰۱-۲۳۴۵-۶۷۸۹-०१२३४५६७८९০১&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;২৩৪৫৬৭৮৯-੦੧੨੩-੪੫੬੭-੮੯૦૧-૨૩૪૫૬૭૮૯୦୧୨୩&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;୪୫୬୭୮୯௦௧-௨௩௪௫-௬௭௮௯-౦౧౨౩-౪౫౬౭౮౯೦೧೨೩೪೫&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;೬೭೮೯൦൧൨൩-൪൫൬൭-൮൯๐๑-๒๓๔๕-๖๗๘๙໐໑໒໓໔໕໖໗&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;໘໙༠༡༢༣༤༥-༦༧༨༩-០១២៣-៤៥៦៧-៨៩᠐᠑᠒᠓᠔᠕᠖᠗᠘᠙&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Correct Regular Expression For GUID's</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2008/01/31/differences-in-guid-serialization.aspx#7360152</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 01:24:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7360152</guid><dc:creator>Rory Primrose</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever wondered what the correct format of a GUID value is? Ever needed a RegEx to validate a GUID as a&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Differences in Guid Serialization</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2008/01/31/differences-in-guid-serialization.aspx#7367421</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:07:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7367421</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Allen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Kevin-&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's something I noticed as well. &amp;nbsp;I know why the code does what it does but I need to do some archeology to find out why that schema was picked.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Interesting Finds: February 1, 2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2008/01/31/differences-in-guid-serialization.aspx#7375936</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:54:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7375936</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description /></item></channel></rss>