<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Forwarding Service, Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx</link><description>I saw that Jesus Rodriguez talked about the forwarding service that was included in the Dublin PDC preview so I thought I'd talk a little bit about what motivated the creation of this service and how I think it might be used. The idea of shipping a general-purpose</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Forwarding Service, Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9284124</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:28:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9284124</guid><dc:creator>David Nelson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;What do you mean by &amp;quot;single source&amp;quot;? Multiple logical and physical sources is a very common requirement for application message routing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Forwarding Service, Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9286538</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:16:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9286538</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Allen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi David,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Single source-multiple destination means that a single message send can lead to several messages being delivered. &amp;nbsp;For example, think of pub-sub systems that deliver a message to multiple subscribers. &amp;nbsp;There may be more than one publisher (message sender).&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Link Listing - January 9, 2009</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9301861</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:33:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9301861</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Steen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;ASP.NET Get Primary key on Row Command (GridView) [Via: aghausman12 ] Alternate way to select ASP.NET...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Link Listing - January 9, 2009</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9301866</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:34:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9301866</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Steen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Link Listing - January 9, 2009&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Forwarding Service, Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9302150</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:04:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9302150</guid><dc:creator>JH</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;As someone who is having to implement this in a production scenario, I'd distance myself from this thing until it's been worked on a little more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Forwarding Service, Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9302500</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:50:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9302500</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Allen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jason,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there anything in particular that you're worried about?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Forwarding Service, Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9318881</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:51:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9318881</guid><dc:creator>JH</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The duplex binding doesn't work with buffered responses for large files. Took me a long time to figure out (read, &amp;quot;I invested a not-insignificant amount of time trying to figure out where the problem is&amp;quot;) what was going wrong and switch to streamed rather than buffered. Though I am certain I could have modified the code for the router to work with the buffered response, it was easier to switch the method to streamed rather than buffered.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My sneaking suspicion is that it will work just fine for the majority of cases but that it just hasn't been tested in enough scenarios to make it viable to promote without getting tied to supporting each custom scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Forwarding Service, Part 1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/01/05/forwarding-service-part-1.aspx#9320823</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:35:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9320823</guid><dc:creator>Nicholas Allen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Jason,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you referring to the Microsoft.ProcessServer.Messaging.ForwardingService on the VPC? &amp;nbsp;If you can send me the configuration you were trying sometime, I will pass it along since buffered duplex works as far as I know.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>