<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>BizTalk Architecture, High Availability and MSMQ Adapters : Announcements</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Announcements/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: Announcements</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>The BizTalk product team is looking for your feedback!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/2006/02/02/the-biztalk-product-team-is-looking-for-your-feedback.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:523441</guid><dc:creator>EldarM</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/comments/523441.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/commentrss.aspx?PostID=523441</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a little announcement that Nancy asked me to post for your attention:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font face=Verdana size=2&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;The BizTalk product team is looking for your feedback!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;font face=Verdana size=2&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt; We are conducting baseline usability studies of BizTalk Server 2006 over the next several months (Feb – May) and are looking for BizTalk 2004 hands-on users (IT Pro/Developer/Business) to give feedback and help direct the vision for future versions of BizTalk! Your input and participation as we develop our products is extremely valuable to us and helps us ensure that our products address your needs. You will receive a free piece of Microsoft software (or choice of an MSPress book) for your time and feedback.&lt;?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;font face=Verdana size=2&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=MsoNormal&gt;&lt;font face=Verdana size=2&gt;&lt;span style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana"&gt;If you are in the Seattle/Redmond area and would like to participate, please contact &lt;a title=mailto:nancyp@microsoft.com href="mailto:nancyp@microsoft.com"&gt;nancyp@microsoft.com&lt;/a&gt; as soon as possible to get on the schedule!&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=523441" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Announcements/default.aspx">Announcements</category></item><item><title>Leaving BizTalk...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/2006/01/31/leaving-biztalk.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:520690</guid><dc:creator>EldarM</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/comments/520690.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/commentrss.aspx?PostID=520690</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;After more than four years, I am leaving BizTalk and moving to the Windows Server to work on some new cool things. It will be a while before I'll get back to blogging here, so thank you all for your attention this time and coming here to read my notes, I really enjoyed that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards,&lt;br/&gt;Eldar&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=520690" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Generic/default.aspx">Generic</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Announcements/default.aspx">Announcements</category></item><item><title>BizTalk 2006 Beta1 is available...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/2005/07/22/biztalk-2006-beta1-is-available.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 17:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:441805</guid><dc:creator>EldarM</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/comments/441805.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/commentrss.aspx?PostID=441805</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;... from &lt;A href="https://beta.microsoft.com"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#244dca size=2&gt;https://beta.microsoft.com&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you are not registered there, you'll have to pass through sign-off approval process first, because that's&amp;nbsp;the generic place where Microsoft products betas are available.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Notice that once you logged in with your Passport ID, you need to use (on the second screen) GuestID &lt;STRONG&gt;BizTalkBetaTeam &lt;/STRONG&gt;to get straight to BizTalk 2006 Beta 1 form. If you use the Guest ID published on the passport login screen of the Beta place, it will take much more steps to get there. More complete instructions were posted in the Beta newsgroup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=441805" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Announcements/default.aspx">Announcements</category></item><item><title>MSMQ Adapter if available now (alternative to MSMQT Adapter)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/2005/02/21/msmq-adapter-if-available-now-alternative-to-msmqt-adapter.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:377549</guid><dc:creator>EldarM</dc:creator><slash:comments>6</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/comments/377549.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/commentrss.aspx?PostID=377549</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;BTW, MSMQ adapter for BizTalk 2004, that I referred to before, is now available for download at &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=cba87d07-7f50-4d7b-a888-388d123f736e&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=cba87d07-7f50-4d7b-a888-388d123f736e&amp;amp;DisplayLang=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;That's the same adapter, I previously referred to as "MSMQ/C". This is a pretty good alternative to MSMQT adapter shipped in-box. Here are just few thinmgs that differs between MSMQ/T and MSMQ Adapters:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;table id="table1" style="BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse" width="100%" border="1"&gt; &lt;tbody&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" align="middle" width="32%" bgcolor="#66ffff"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;If you want to...&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" align="middle" width="32%" bgcolor="#66ffff"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;MSMQ/T Adapter (in-box)&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" align="middle" width="32%" bgcolor="#66ffff"&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;font size="4"&gt;MSMQ Adapter (new)&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;Run other applications that use MSMQ API (or simply use MSMQ API at all.)&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;Only if you install Windows message queuing (MSMQ) side by side with MSMQT.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;&lt;span style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #00ff00"&gt;Automatically granted,&lt;/span&gt; in fact, MSMQ Adapter itself is using Windows MSMQ API.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;Deliver messages reliably and &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;in order&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; to the BizTalk application (orchestration). Example, when you may need it: financial applications, where customer orders must be executed in the same order as they are received.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;&lt;span style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #00ff00"&gt;That's what MSMQ/T is for. &lt;/span&gt;In fact, that's the only way to reliably do that in BizTalk 2004, short of implementing your own application level protocol.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;No, you cannot use MSMQ Adapter for that in BizTalk 2004.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;Reliably push as many messages onto the BizTalk machine as possible (but not yet into BizTalk per se). Example, when you need it: sending messages from an unreliable machine that may go down for a significant period of time.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;Tough, MSMQ/T submits messages directly into BizTalk, hence it gets messages from the network only as fast as BizTalk can consume them.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;&lt;span style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #00ff00"&gt;Perfect. &lt;/span&gt;Messages are accumulated on the local disk of BizTalk machine in MSMQ queue with usual MSMQ throughput (huge one). Then BizTalk picks it up from the local queue at its own pace.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;Pass huge messages (see BizTalk docs for the exact numbers)&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;&lt;span style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #00ff00"&gt;Good. &lt;/span&gt;MSMQ/T has everything streamed, so for large messages there is no single moment in time when the whole message must be in memory. As a result, MSMQ/T messages by design should be only limited by the size of your database. Keep in mind, however, that it is only supported to a certain limit stated in the documentation. Also, if your database has 2Gb of a disk space, it may be not quite a bright idea to fill it with 1Gb blobs.&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%"&gt;You still can pass pretty large messages, however, MQRTLARGE.DLL that is utilized by MSMQ Adapter, accumulates the whole message in memory, effectively limiting the size of a message you can pass through.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt; &lt;tr&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt; &lt;td style="BORDER-RIGHT: 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: 1px solid; BORDER-LEFT: 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px solid" width="32%" bgcolor="#ccffff"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=377549" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/MSMQT/default.aspx">MSMQT</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Announcements/default.aspx">Announcements</category></item><item><title>Adapter Migration Toolkit is released on 01/21</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/2005/02/11/adapter-migration-toolkit-is-released-on-01-21.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:371160</guid><dc:creator>EldarM</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/comments/371160.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/commentrss.aspx?PostID=371160</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;This little piece is designed to help migrating your BizTalk 2002 components (AICs, custom preprocessors) to BizTalk 2004 by providing shims. It's downloadable at the &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3383F89E-8223-4DB5-947A-1873C4C555BB&amp;amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank"&gt;MS download center&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Also, please, notice the &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;whitepaper on BizTalk 2002 to BizTalk 2004 migration&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; in the same download location --&amp;nbsp;see the link on the right in "Related resources. It's a self-extracting zip file.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=371160" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Announcements/default.aspx">Announcements</category></item><item><title>One more blog on BizTalk</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/2004/07/21/one-more-blog-on-biztalk.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:22:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:189872</guid><dc:creator>EldarM</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/comments/189872.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/commentrss.aspx?PostID=189872</wfw:commentRss><description>Ok, so here is one more blog on BizTalk. Is there anything different about it? I hope to make it so. Let see, what we have now from the people from Microsoft. 
&lt;P&gt;First, we have an excellent weblog from &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/scottwoo/" target=_blank&gt;Scott Woodgate&lt;/A&gt;. That&amp;#8217;s a blog #1 for everybody interested in BizTalk covering news, hints, little insider info, developer&amp;#8217;s competitions, not to mention some New Zealand stuff. :-) 
&lt;P&gt;Then we have blogs from &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/Biztalk_Core_Engine/" target=_blank&gt;Lee&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/kevinsmi/" target=_blank&gt;Kevin&lt;/A&gt;. These blogs will talk about the core messaging engine. If your questions are about life of the message before it gets to the database &amp;#8211; Kevin is the best man to answer it. What happens to the message once it got into the database (and there is a lot happening there) &amp;#8211; Lee is the man. And when Lee hands the message over from the database, guess who takes care of it? Kevin. Actually, there is a thin layer between, which they both know very well. 
&lt;P&gt;I worked with Kevin and Lee on the core messaging engine for BizTalk 2004 in Redmond. Actually, I am still in Redmond and I still work on Messaging Engine with Lee (and few other very smart guys, who are just too humble to start their own blogs). As to Kevin, alas! &amp;#8211; he&amp;#8217;s gone to the better world, well, I mean Europe. He is now Microsoft Consulting Service consultant working on BizTalk projects in the United Kingdom. Which means that we can expect pretty interesting posts from him based on his experience. 
&lt;P&gt;Just to brag a little, before BizTalk I worked on MSXML, including MSXML 5 in Office XP, MSXML 4 used in a lot of places (including BizTalk), and MSXML 3 sitting in every Windows box in the world. Before Microsoft I spent about 20 years as a developer in various places, companies and roles &amp;#8211; if you need to know, here are the &lt;A href="http://www.eldar.com/eldar/eldar.htm" target=_blank&gt;details&lt;/A&gt;. 
&lt;P&gt;In this weblog I plan to talk about more architectural level things around BizTalk. Topics that I think of now are like &amp;#8220;stateless&amp;#8221; server, making BizTalk scale, fault-tolerance, sins of synchronous communications architecture to name few. I don&amp;#8217;t plan to do it often, may be twice a month. 
&lt;P&gt;So, here we are, &lt;BR&gt;Eldar Musayev&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=189872" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/BizTalk/default.aspx">BizTalk</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/eldarm/archive/tags/Announcements/default.aspx">Announcements</category></item></channel></rss>