<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Overloading the semantics of the register keyword.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericflee/archive/2004/06/08/151481.aspx</link><description>I often think about what I would change in C++ were I given carte blanche to update the language. One thing in particular has been on mind in recent months&amp;#8212;the register keyword. The register keyword was originally intended to allow C programmers</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Overloading the semantics of the register keyword.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericflee/archive/2004/06/08/151481.aspx#151685</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:151685</guid><dc:creator>Dmitriy Zaslavskiy</dc:creator><description>1. This is pretty good idea, and this can be done without any changes to the language itself.&lt;br&gt;2. How come VC8 doesn't distinguish long double and double? I thought VC7 did. Have to go back and check.</description></item><item><title>re: Overloading the semantics of the register keyword.</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericflee/archive/2004/06/08/151481.aspx#152872</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 18:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:152872</guid><dc:creator>John Alberts</dc:creator><description>Interesting idea; I think there is a similar proposal for Java (?).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Two questions:&lt;br&gt;What would &amp;quot;register float&amp;quot; mean?&lt;br&gt;How would this work under fp:fast?</description></item></channel></rss>