C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

re: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

Diego Mijelshon — Thu, 05 Feb 2004 21:30:00 GMT

Eric,
Thanks for your answer.

While I completely understand your position, I
was thinking about the kind of stuff you find in Microsoft Research, such as http://research.microsoft.com/~nick/polyphony/intro.htm, or things like Xen...

Obviously, everyone wants to add his own extensions to C#, but since that's not gonna happen, it would be nice to know which ones you are actually considering, even if you have to put a red H1 disclaimer about them.

re: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

Mike Kozlowski — Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:05:00 GMT

If you're talking about Microsoft press releases or something, yeah, probably not to say anything expectation-raising. But if you write a blog entry that's all hedged about with disclaimers, I suspect most people are going to be pretty reasonable when it fails to map closely to reality.

re: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

Shawn — Thu, 05 Feb 2004 23:30:00 GMT

woah, where getting polyhponic C#, in 3.0? That's cool.

<disclaimer: I'm not a lamer, not a moron, and I'm not serious about this post. I'm only joking. =)) />

Thanks,
Shawn

Take Outs: The Digital Doggy Bag of Blog Bits for 5 February 2004

Enjoy Every Sandwich — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 09:04:00 GMT

re: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

Micael Baerens — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 08:23:00 GMT

You do know that now we'll expect parallelizing capabilities to be added, right? ;-)

re: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

moo — Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:26:00 GMT

I also expect it to put hair on my chest and add 1" to my pecker.

re: C# Language Features beyond Whidbey

moo — Sat, 07 Feb 2004 11:51:00 GMT

Anonymous methods = bad.

win.SizeChanged += delegate { win.Text = "My Avalon Window changed"; };

The call to win.SizeChanged += blah means SUBSCRIBE to this event. Now what been done here is when the debugger steps to the anonymous code block, its confusing, because when i see += operators on events, i think SUBSCRIBE not do this block of code. Its bad bad bad.

So now I have to think, oh wait, its saying its subscribing, but infact its not when infact the event has fired its now jumping into the SUBSCRIBE code block in the debuber.

Totally confusing.

Take Outs: The Digital Doggy Bag of Blog Bits for 6,7 and 8 February 2004

Enjoy Every Sandwich — Mon, 09 Feb 2004 09:44:00 GMT

Doing things the hard way with RSS Bandit leads to some interesting statistics; Stuff for my Boss and co-workers; SOA and Joe Developer -- Phillip gets it right (again); Bits on Reporting Services; Wake up and smell RSS.NET; htmlArea (drool); InfoPath duh; McD's

Re:

RebelGeekz — Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:58:00 GMT

[http://itpeixun.51.net/][http://aissl.51.net/][http://kukuxz003.freewebpage.org/][http://kukuxz001.51.net/][http://kukuxz003.51.net/][http://kukuxz005.51.net/][http://kukuxz002.51.net/][http://kukuxz004.freewebpage.org/][http://kukuxz007.51.net/][http://kukuxz001.freewebpage.org/][http://kukuxz006.51.net/][http://kukuxz002.freewebpage.org/][http://kukuxz004.51.net/][http://kukuxz008.51.net/][http://kukuxz009.51.net/][http://kukuxz005.freewebpage.org/][http://kukuxz006.freewebpage.org/][http://kukuxz007.freewebpage.org/][http://kukuxz009.freewebpage.org/]