<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx</link><description>Last year we declared a relatively simple interface to represent an immutable binary tree. We noticed that it was different from every other interface that we've declared so far, in that it really said nothing at all about the immutability of the tree.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#7153019</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:53:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7153019</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#7162288</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:21:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7162288</guid><dc:creator>Tanveer Badar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;'Last year we declared a relatively simple interface to represent an immutable binary tree.'&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Has it been that long? Really?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#7162433</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:39:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7162433</guid><dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Last year is only 3 weeks ago :P&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Community Convergence XXXIX</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#7180701</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:43:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7180701</guid><dc:creator>Charlie Calvert's Community Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Welcome to the XXXIX issue of Community Convergence. The big news this week is that Microsoft has begun&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#7182074</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:46:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7182074</guid><dc:creator>Frans Bouma</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A bit offtopic, but why do you force the Key to implement IComparable&amp;lt;K&amp;gt; ? Why not compare with a Func&amp;lt;K, K, int&amp;gt; so you can implement with the same code min AND max sorted trees without forcing the implementation of IComparable on the K type. ?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#7185162</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:30:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7185162</guid><dc:creator>Eric Lippert</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;First off, the point of this series is not to develop the most fully-featured possible implementation of a dictionary object. Rather, it's to demonstrate that it is possible to solve real problems using immutable data structures; that situations where you might think that mutation is necessary are implementable in other ways. &amp;nbsp;Programming using immutable data structures will become more important in C# in the future, so I would like these tools to be in people's toolboxes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Immutability in C#</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#7200358</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:30:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7200358</guid><dc:creator>&lt;a href="http://weblogs.asp.net/bleroy"&gt;Tales from the Evil Empire&lt;/a&gt;</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For some reason, there's been a lot of buzz lately around immutability in C#. If you're interested in&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Immutability in C# Part Eight: Even More On Binary Trees</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ericlippert/archive/2008/01/18/immutability-in-c-part-eight-even-more-on-binary-trees.aspx#9893840</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:34:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9893840</guid><dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I have read the series with interest and I am definitely now a believer in immutability. However, I can't seem to see any talk about an immutable NON binary tree? &amp;nbsp;I'm trying to figure out if I'm being totally crazy for trying to see a way for it to be possible?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>