<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>PDC05: Compensating activities</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/esperpento/archive/2005/09/16/469144.aspx</link><description>PDC05 The other day I mentioned some of the issues surrounding the appropriate scenarios for atomic transactions deployment. I also mentioned the compensating model for long-running activities. Choosing between these models inside distributed applications</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>PDC05 - Distributed Transactions and Attendance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/esperpento/archive/2005/09/16/469144.aspx#470859</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 16:09:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:470859</guid><dc:creator>Kirk Allen Evans' Blog</dc:creator><description>I spent a lot of time at PDC debating the merits and drawbacks of distributed transactions and appropriate...</description></item><item><title> Esperpento PDC05 Compensating activities | Cellulite Creams</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/esperpento/archive/2005/09/16/469144.aspx#9720583</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:35:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9720583</guid><dc:creator> Esperpento PDC05 Compensating activities | Cellulite Creams</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://cellulitecreamsite.info/story.php?id=337"&gt;http://cellulitecreamsite.info/story.php?id=337&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>