Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

More on a small computer...

Lora and I exchanged some lengthy emails last night on this subject.  Here's the one that kicked it off, basically indicating that my pricing structure was definitely off.  While I later concede some of her points, there are some other factors involved that I'll just have to leave to your imagination...

Hey Evan,

Are your daughters going to use Linux? LOL You took me back in time. I felt like I was reading an article from 1999 or 2000 because of the hardware description.

I'm not sure that your costs are right. Was that Microsoft cost or real cost after import taxes, US sales office profit margin, then for sale?

You say $50 for the board, but let's use a board that is available en mass and people are doing what you described:

VIA EPIA-V8000A VIA C3, uses SDRAM, has audio, video, and LAN - Cost $88 in bulk; retails for $99 Case with Power supply - 90W minimum required - Cost somewhere around $50 - $100 depending on appearance and quality of power supply SDRAM memory - nonECC, unbuffered, 512MB - Cost $89 on open market, B or C grade, so it is a step up from toy grade Hard drive - 40GB for around $48 Windows XP Home $83 Total Cost $358 plus freight * 1.05 = $375

Wow the system builder just made $17. I'm sure they'll be thrilled. lol Of course, there is keyboard, mouse, optical drive, and display too. Even if the case and motherboard are sub $100, as you suggest, then you're still not any more competitive over current $399 systems. What's compelling about it?

If you want a $399 system, there are plenty to choose from, and some with quite a bit more processing power -- either AMD or Intel based. (Yes, then you have a fan.)

3) Remember, 5+ year old kids want streaming audio, streaming video, play games, play MP3s while chatting, chat, and more chat. Four year old technology can't handle this. Plus, they want USB 2.0, IR, and bluetooth to sync with their other gadgets. Run as much as a kid would, and then see if you think it's fast enough. Go to a few pre-teen sites, the javascript doll making sites, play iTunes, and have 5 chat windows open, plus homework, and then see if it's OK. Adults are usually more careful about what they open than kids.

4) Put it into a robot that can do the things 2-4 year old kids want and OK, I can rationalize it a little better then. Or, just use a smartphone and figure out a way to attach it to a monitor. Either of those ways are cheap and cute.

It's a tough product to sell, and a few companies like AJump, EWiz, Max Group, ASI, etc are building low cost, small boxes. Intel has repeatedly had a problem with microATX, VIA with miniITX, and now with the miniBTX. If anything, VIA with miniITX was able to ride the edge of custom systems and portable gaming machines for LAN parties, but these are not sub $400 systems. (Check out www.mini-ITX.com)

-- Lora

She's right that it's easy to build a cheap"ish" system using commercially available parts, but of course you get what you pay for.  But what if I was paying for a different value proposition to begin with?  Could you make a market as big as the current PC industry with a different value proposition?  Probably not.  But maybe just maybe you could create something just a little special.

Published Tuesday, December 14, 2004 8:11 AM by EvanF
Filed under:

Comments

# re: More on a small computer...

"Remember, 5+ year old kids want streaming audio, streaming video, play games, play MP3s while chatting, chat, and more chat."

Last year, after my daughter destroyed her Windows 2000 install for the Nth time, I "upgraded" her from her old computer (fairly old, it was a hand-me-down) - an AMD K6/3-400 - to a used Mac.

Powermac G3 (beige) - $70, used (now available for $40)
PCI Radeon 7000 - $90, used (now available for $70)
30G hard drive - $90 (now 40G for $40)
256M PC/100 RAM - $45 (about the same price!)
Hand-me-down OS/X 10.2 Jaguar - $50 (now $30)

Now this was a good deal slower than what she had before, particularly with the first generation G3 PCI bridge. I could get a much better deal now... but he's had it for a year, she's gone "Ghengis Khan" the way she did on Windows, including randomly trashing stuff in "/Applications" when she runs out of space, and it's still stable. Oh... and she does everything Lora described... and I have been able to quit rebuilding C:\ from scratch every few months.

That's running on top of UNIX, remember.

The old computer? We now have a FreeBSD box in the spare bedroom with Gnome and Gnome aps, GAIM, etc, and I know she uses it for chat when her computer's offline (I have a script that cuts it off at the firewall at bedtime. :-)).

Remember, that's a K6/3-400.

Four year old technology can too handle it. That Mac came out in 1998. The K6/3-400 was new in January 1999. We're talking 6-7 year old technology.
Tuesday, December 14, 2004 12:03 PM by Peter da Silva

# re: More on a small computer...

Yeah, this was just the first email of a long exchange. We both learned as it went along. Yes, old technology runs. The ever popular ASUS T2P4 motherboards with Pentium processors are still running for many people. I won't disagree with that.

What I was discussing with Evan is the viability of a business based on using old technology (old yet newly product, not used or pre-owned) and how that is different from someone doing it themselves. I joked that the hammer beside the old hardware was because old hardware had flaws and we learned from our mistakes and built new and better designs. Plus, I had to ask him what the compelling difference for a consumer to buy a system like he described instead of a $399 system with a faster processor, newer chipset, faster memory, etc, especially when the price difference is minimal.

I think a better way to describe what Evan is using is new, low-end technology. At least, I feel much more comfortable with that description over comparing it with 3 year old + technology. There are great opportunities for certain market segments to have affordable "PCs". AMD's PIC is a good example. It retails for $185 and includes a software, keyboard and mouse; $249 with a monitor. Someone can then have internet access, basic word processing, email, etc.
Tuesday, December 14, 2004 3:12 PM by Lora

# re: More on a small computer...

I don't know any 5+ year old kids that need/want all that.. maybe 10+ so they can play video games.. otherwise most don't have the attention span to deal with all that..
Tuesday, December 14, 2004 5:07 PM by Hellsbellboy

# Evan s Weblog of Tech and Life More on a small computer | low cost car insurance

# Evan s Weblog of Tech and Life More on a small computer | debt solutions

Anonymous comments are disabled
 
Page view tracker