<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>FeedSync and the OSP</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/feedsync/archive/2007/12/19/feedsync-and-the-osp.aspx</link><description>Since our publication of the FeedSync 1.0 specification earlier this month, a few people have asked me questions about the licensing terms in the spec. So, today, we wanted to make our intent as clear as possible by covering the FeedSync specification</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>FeedSync now covered by the Open Specification Promise</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/feedsync/archive/2007/12/19/feedsync-and-the-osp.aspx#6809307</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:00:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6809307</guid><dc:creator>Steven Lees</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've been talking to more people about FeedSync since I posted the v1 specification earlier this month.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>