<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>well, since you asked twice...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fivetestersfromvc/archive/2004/05/27/143455.aspx</link><description>[Rob] Woon asked in his comment about the % automation we have with our IDE tests. Currently, we are at roughly 50% automated in the IDE compared to the total number of active test cases. These tests range from DTE manipulations to actual UI interations</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: well, since you asked twice...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fivetestersfromvc/archive/2004/05/27/143455.aspx#145225</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 08:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:145225</guid><dc:creator>Woon Kiat</dc:creator><description>Haha, sorry, not intend to post twice. Because after the first posting, I found the page still show Comments(0), and I thought my first comment is not posted. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for your answer, Rob. You have cleared some of my doubts on automated UI testing. Hopefully you will soon blog on testing and verifying the binary output of the compiler. Cheers!</description></item></channel></rss>