Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

Bite the bullet and give us full text

Blogging was supposed to be that great medium that will help us transition from the web world where the design and the presentation so often dictate what we see and where individuals and companies are judged by how they look to a world where the ideas are the main thing and everybody is earning ranks based on their minds and souls.

Well, at least it was supposed to be about content, not about presentation. And it was supposed to speed up the processing of the information overflow and help us find the interesting stuff.

And it is - to a degree, though. There are still people that would put in their feed only 20 words. Which is great if these 20 words are the essence. But, every so often these words are just the first 20 words of the post. And as with any beginning, they often fail to catch my attention.

This feels wrong on so many levels. Here I'll list only few:

  • I often have to make a decision whether I want to read something based on the author's name only, not on the content.
  • I've lost any supposed productivity gains, as I have to resort back to the browser - granted, it's embeded in my reader, but it's still the browser and it has to fetch the page and render all the html, download all the graphics, run all the flash. And it's slow.
  • It presents to me lot of visual crap - my eyes have to process the navigation, the title of the blog, any page headers and whatever other "noise" there is, just to get to the content.

Anyhow, Chris Clark said it better than me.

Bite the bullet and give us full text.

Published Tuesday, January 20, 2004 11:50 AM by Franci Penov
Filed under:

Comments

# re: Bite the bullet and give us full text

Franci,

It's easier to expect bloggers to write well with the understanding that the first 20 words are an advertisement for the rest of the article. Let natural selection take its course rather than opening the floodgates to even more poor writing from each blogger. Sure, they'll be a blog or two that are true gems despite poor writing, and we'll get links to those people from other, well-written blogs. Just keep in mind that good writing is like good coding. Bad coding won't be any easier to understand by looking at all of it.

-GP
Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:04 PM by Greg Pyatt

# re: Bite the bullet and give us full text

If the twenty words were to represent the essence of the article - fine. But twenty words that end mid-sentence?

If I get the full text, I can easily read 20, 40 or 100 words - as much as my interest is kept. And I can go to the web page of the author if I want/need to.

With useles excerpt - I have to go to the web page even to be able to judge if the article is worth reading it.

meanwhile, it's a lot harder to write short summary that captures the essence, than it is to write to whole enchilada. To continue on your analogy - there are lot of programmers that can whip up decent programs. But when it comes to writing small footprint blaizingly fast functions, they often have fail.
Tuesday, January 20, 2004 12:14 PM by Franci Penov

# re: Bite the bullet and give us full text

Hey if you think a 20 word summary is bad, look at the feeds from Moreover - they're just titles! Combine that with content like.. open-source software project names (the antithesis of good marketing) and you have a completely worthless feed.
Tuesday, January 20, 2004 2:58 PM by Greg Pyatt
New Comments to this post are disabled
 
Page view tracker