<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>FAQ: Which Code Analysis rules shipped in which version?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx</link><description>In response to a lot of recent requests, we've put together a complete list of rules that shipped in the different versions of Visual Studio Code Analysis and FxCop. Attached is an Excel worksheet providing this information for Visual Studio 2005, Visual</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: FAQ: Which Code Analysis rules shipped in which version?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#7018609</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:47:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7018609</guid><dc:creator>Nicole Calinoiu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Somewhat on the topic of rules that aren't applicable anymore, I've been meaning to ask about Security.ReviewVisibleEventHandlers for a while now... &amp;nbsp;It's still quite applicable to .NET 1.x assemblies, but is there some reason that it should also verify .NET 2.0+ assemblies given the changes that were made in .NET 2.0 to include delegate &amp;quot;wirer-uppers&amp;quot; in CAS demands (as described at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/eugene_bobukh/archive/2005/06/08/427074.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/eugene_bobukh/archive/2005/06/08/427074.aspx&lt;/a&gt;)?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: FAQ: Which Code Analysis rules shipped in which version?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#7018638</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 21:51:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7018638</guid><dc:creator>David M. Kean</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Nicole. I wasn't aware of these changes - I'll investigate and get back to you.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: FAQ: Which Code Analysis rules shipped in which version?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#7022379</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:33:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7022379</guid><dc:creator>lextm</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I am using Visual Studio Pro and find out that FxCop 1.36 Beta cannot work well with it. When I try to go to source, even though a Visual Studio instance is already launched, FxCop launches another one for me. Silly!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I cannot afford Visual Studio Team Suite, but could you make FxCop works better with Pro? Even open source SharpDevelop has a better connection with FxCop.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>VSTS Links - 01/09/2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#7046346</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:34:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7046346</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Michal on Small Orcas Improvement - part 2. Ed Hintz on Over 1 Billion Served. The SRL Team Blog on Working...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Some Code Analysis Rules gone in Visual Studio 2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#7102236</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:15:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7102236</guid><dc:creator>Visual Studio Team System (VSTS) Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was very sad to hear that a few beloved rules were removed from code analysis (aka FxCop) in Visual&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: FAQ: Which Code Analysis rules shipped in which version?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#7102952</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:46:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7102952</guid><dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why are the maintainability and reliability rules not also part of FxCop 1.36? Other than that, it's an exact match on rules with VS2008 which is great for those of us that only have VS2008 Express or Professional editions.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: FAQ: Which Code Analysis rules shipped in which version?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#8348343</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 19:02:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8348343</guid><dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In CodeAnalysisRules.xls, what does &amp;quot;Removed in data flow engine&amp;quot; mean?&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Links from today's VSTS workshop at VSLive! Orlando</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#8515296</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:58:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8515296</guid><dc:creator>Shut-Up and Smile</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Visual Studio&amp;#174; Team System 2008 Team Foundation Server and Team Suite VPC Image (Trial) &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoft"&gt;http://www.microsoft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Links from today's VSTS workshop at VSLive! Orlando</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#8515355</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:07:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8515355</guid><dc:creator>WCF Community Bloggers</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Visual Studio&amp;#174; Team System 2008 Team Foundation Server and Team Suite VPC Image (Trial) &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=c7a809d8-8c9f-439f-8147-948bc6957812&amp;amp;amp;displaylang=en"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=c7a809d8-8c9f-439f-8147-948bc6957812&amp;amp;amp;displaylang=en&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Visual Studio Team System 2008 Development Edition with MSDN Premium Subscription</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#9399282</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 20:44:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9399282</guid><dc:creator>Termékinformációk fejlesztőknek</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;[ Nacsa S&amp;#225;ndor , 2009. janu&amp;#225;r 19. – febru&amp;#225;r 5.] Ez a Team System v&amp;#225;ltozat fejlett eszk&amp;#246;zrendszert k&amp;#237;n&amp;#225;l&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Highlight on Visual Studio 2008 Quality Features</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/fxcop/archive/2008/01/07/faq-which-rules-shipped-in-which-version.aspx#9479817</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 00:03:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9479817</guid><dc:creator>US ISV Developer Evangelism Team</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the features, coming with Visual Studio out of the box which is widely under-used is the static&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>