<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>George Cerbone's blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/default.aspx</link><description>Thoughts on infrastructure architecture</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>How long is a piece of string?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/09/21/how-long-is-a-piece-of-string.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:33:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5032534</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/5032534.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=5032534</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;A raging email thread on one of our internal aliases led me to an old blog entry about &lt;A href="http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2005/12/16/504659.aspx" mce_href="http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2005/12/16/504659.aspx"&gt;self-locking kangaroos&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have the same kind of thing in architecture.&amp;nbsp; I am often asked "What is the best way to..." or its logical corollary "Take a look at this architecture and make sure there is nothing wrong with it."&amp;nbsp; These kinds of questions are what I used to call "How long is a piece of string" questions.&amp;nbsp; Without extra context, it is really tough to answer them.&amp;nbsp; It's like asking "Which is a better car for me... a mini-van, or a roadster?"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In architecture, we call this additional context functional and non-functional requirements.&amp;nbsp; Tools like &lt;A class="" href="http://www.perspectivebasedarchitecture.com/" mce_href="http://www.perspectivebasedarchitecture.com"&gt;PBA&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;can make it easier to identify thse requirements.&amp;nbsp; As architects, we look at the context and try to make smart trade offs.&amp;nbsp; But there is rarely a "best" answer to most of these problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5032534" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Infrastructure+Architecture/default.aspx">Infrastructure Architecture</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/PBA/default.aspx">PBA</category></item><item><title>Web 2.0 thoughts from the boss</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/09/14/web-2-0-thoughts-from-the-boss.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 21:13:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4915274</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/4915274.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4915274</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/dankasun/default.aspx"&gt;Dan&lt;/a&gt; has written a &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/dankasun/archive/2007/09/14/why-web-2-0-is-important-whether-you-like-it-or-not-aka-why-blogging-is-difficult-for-us-old-farts-and-how-it-relates-to-s-s.aspx"&gt;great post&lt;/a&gt; on Web 2.0 and why young(er) folks seem to "get" it more easily.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;I've learned two things:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;1) I am old.&amp;nbsp; Thanks, Dan.&amp;nbsp; :)&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;2) I've often said that technology is much more a reflection of sociology then anything else.&amp;nbsp; That's why so many problems in the enterprise are so hard, and so many "tech" projects fail.&amp;nbsp; To paraphrase &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/Good-Great-Companies-Leap-Others/dp/0066620996"&gt;Jim Collins&lt;/a&gt;..."First figure out what you want people to do, then figure out how to make them do it."&lt;/p&gt; &lt;h3&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/dankasun/default.aspx"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4915274" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Cool+Stuff/default.aspx">Cool Stuff</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Web+2.0/default.aspx">Web 2.0</category></item><item><title>Enterprise Authorization</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/09/13/enterprise-authorization.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 18:31:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4895570</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/4895570.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4895570</wfw:commentRss><description>My colleague &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/curtd/default.aspx"&gt;Curt Devlin&lt;/a&gt; has written a &lt;a href="http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb417064.aspx"&gt;great article&lt;/a&gt; on enterprise authorization.&amp;#xA0; This is a really thorny problem that is going to get worse as enterprises become more and more virtual.&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4895570" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Infrastructure+Architecture/default.aspx">Infrastructure Architecture</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Security/default.aspx">Security</category></item><item><title>Sun to sell Windows</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/09/13/sun-to-sell-windows.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4894784</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/4894784.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4894784</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I never thought that I would see the day that&amp;nbsp;Microsoft and Sun would have become so close, but Sun is going to sell servers &lt;A href="http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9035979&amp;amp;intsrc=hm_list" mce_href="http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9035979&amp;amp;intsrc=hm_list"&gt;pre-installed with Windows&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's good to see...I've always thought Sun was a great company.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4894784" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Will Microsoft Become Facebook for the Enterprise?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/09/13/will-microsoft-become-facebook-for-the-enterprise.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:40:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4894279</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/4894279.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4894279</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2182392,00.asp" mce_href="http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,2182392,00.asp"&gt;Great article from CIO&lt;/A&gt; on some really innovative social networking work that Wachovia is doing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4894279" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Financial+Services/default.aspx">Financial Services</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Cool+Stuff/default.aspx">Cool Stuff</category></item><item><title>Death of the Datacenter</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/09/10/death-of-the-datacenter.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4856574</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/4856574.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4856574</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I've believed for a long time that the "Datacenter" as it exists today is a doomed entity, which needs to become a logical construct rather than a physical construct. Apparently, &lt;A href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1895%2C2180379%2C00.asp" mce_href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C1895%2C2180379%2C00.asp"&gt;Forrester agrees&lt;/A&gt;. I agree with the first part of the conclusion, that pervasive networking will be a key driver going forward. I'm not so convinced that it immediately leads to desktop virtualization.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4856574" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Infrastructure+Architecture/default.aspx">Infrastructure Architecture</category></item><item><title>First MCA board</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/08/23/first-mca-board.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4527943</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/4527943.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4527943</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I recently got the opportunity to serve on my first MCA board in Atlanta, GA.&amp;nbsp; Congratulations to all of the candidates that achieved the certification.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;One thing that stood out for me....we need to find a way to better prepare candidates.&amp;nbsp; We had several folks who were very close to the bar, and I think that with a little more prep, they would have been able to achieve the cert.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To that end, I am working with some other MCAs to put together a set of resources for prospective candidates.&amp;nbsp; Look for some more info here soon.&amp;nbsp; And if anyone who is pursuing the certification has ideas on what they would like to see, let me know that, too.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;Edit: Corrected spelling.&amp;nbsp; Thanks, Mom!&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4527943" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/MCA/default.aspx">MCA</category></item><item><title>Green Datacenter Initiative</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2007/08/23/green-datacenter-initative.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:18:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:4527876</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/4527876.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=4527876</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;One thing that has been on my mind lately...how can folks reduce the amount of power that they are consuming in the datacenter.&amp;nbsp; Very few architects look at power efficiency as a first-class system quality.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In my mind, this is something that is going to take a while to solve.&amp;nbsp; It is roughly analogous to security as a system quality.&amp;nbsp; Infrastructure architects can build firewalls, set up traffic monitors, but at the application layer architects have to consider security important and architect their solutions&amp;nbsp;with that quality in mind.&amp;nbsp; It's the precise same problem with power.&amp;nbsp; We will see initial stabs from the infrastructure side of the house, but it will be a while before apps are power aware.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think that green is the next big thing in the datacenter, and not just because of environmental concerns.&amp;nbsp; Power is expensive and getting more so.&amp;nbsp; Power cost quickly dwarfs acquisition cost.&amp;nbsp; Architects need to consider these things when they design systems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=4527876" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Infrastructure+Architecture/default.aspx">Infrastructure Architecture</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Green+Datacenter/default.aspx">Green Datacenter</category></item><item><title>MSDN Financial Services Industry Center</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2006/12/18/msdn-financial-services-industry-center.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1317912</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/1317912.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1317912</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;Check out the &lt;A class="" title=top name=top&gt;&lt;/A&gt;MSDN Financial Services Industry Center, run by Mike Walker.&amp;nbsp; Excellent content!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="" title=http://msdn.microsoft.com/FinServArch href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/FinServArch" mce_href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/FinServArch"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/FinServArch&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1317912" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Financial+Services/default.aspx">Financial Services</category></item><item><title>Windows PowerShell...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2006/11/15/windows-powershell.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 20:41:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1081599</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/1081599.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=1081599</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;...has relased to the web!&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Download is available here:&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;a title="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/powershell/download.mspx" href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/powershell/download.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/technologies/management/powershell/download.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1081599" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Financial Services Webcast series</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2006/08/17/704351.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:704351</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/704351.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=704351</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;The 3rd &lt;b&gt;Unwrapped for Financial Services Webcast Series for Developers&lt;/b&gt; is coming up in September.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;This series is presented live, and includes both technical and strategic session&amp;nbsp;on Microsoft solutions for Capital Markets, Retail Banking and Insurance firms.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Check out &lt;a href="http://www.financialdevelopers.com/"&gt;http://www.financialdevelopers.com/&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;for more information, or &lt;a href="http://www.financialdevelopers.com/registration.aspx"&gt;register here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=704351" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/tags/Financial+Services/default.aspx">Financial Services</category></item><item><title>Perspective Based Architecture</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2006/08/16/702974.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:27:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:702974</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/702974.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=702974</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;My colleagues, &lt;a href="http://blogs.technet.com/lcurtis/"&gt;Lewis Curtis&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/archetype"&gt;Ryan Plantm&lt;/a&gt; and I have been working on an architecture methodology called "Perspective Based Architecture" or the PBA method.&amp;nbsp; The idea is to move to a question based framework that can be employed within any other methodology that may already employed.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Check out the website &lt;a href="http://perspectivebasedarchitecture.com/default.aspx"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=702974" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>First post from Live Writer!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2006/08/15/701168.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:38:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:701168</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/701168.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=701168</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Now that we have released the&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://ideas.live.com/programPage.aspx?versionId=4372c8c2-b76f-4d44-aea1-9835b61d8dc1"&gt;Live Witer&lt;/a&gt; beta, I'm planning on being much better about keeping my blog up to date.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=701168" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>George awarded MCA</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2005/08/03/447060.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2005 09:42:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:447060</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/447060.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=447060</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;I have just been notified that I have sucessfuly passed the architecture board, and I am officially a &lt;A href="http://www.microsoft.com/architecture/default.aspx?pid=share.certification&amp;amp;abver=FEEB2E89-4412-4C58-A7F8-9B2CA0E0BDAC"&gt;Microsoft Certified Architect&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; I have to give many, many thanks to my mentors &lt;A href="http://blogs.technet.com/lcurtis"&gt;Lewis Curtis&lt;/A&gt;, and Allen Stewart, without whom I would not have made it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will blog on my MCA experience soon....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=447060" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rights management tension</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/archive/2005/08/01/446369.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2005 03:10:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:446369</guid><dc:creator>gcerbone</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/comments/446369.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/gcerbone/commentrss.aspx?PostID=446369</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;P&gt;A comment to a recent post to my blog regarding rights management:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Sounds like an innovation your customers don't really want/need. Stronger integrated rights management mainly benefits content owners, and allows the imposition of unreasonable limitations on content use. I am in particular talking about, for example, buying a song, and having it only be listenable from my one PC, and not be portable to my laptop, or my iPod, or some other device. So, this is why, I for one, am not enthused about these "innovations."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First, thanks for reading, and thanks for your comment!&amp;nbsp; Although I was using the RM example as, well, an example, I think you bring up some interesting points.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I understand the tension between the desire of content owners to protect their content, and the desire of consumers of content not to be restricted.&amp;nbsp; There have been RM schemes that have been very restricitve, and the kind of symptoms that you describe have been painful for folks.&amp;nbsp; And I think that is precisely why we need to have a common, flexible, transparant rights management platform that makes it easy to migrate content from one device to another.&amp;nbsp; Stronger rights management benefits content owners.&amp;nbsp; More transparent rights management benfits both owners and consumers.&amp;nbsp; And enterprises, too, are very interested in being able to apply rights management to business documents.&amp;nbsp; We use this internally at Microsoft.&amp;nbsp; Powerpoint presentations that are for internal use only get rights managed.&amp;nbsp; Even if someone copies them off of a file share onto the internet, the content stays protected.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I also think content consumers benefit from rights management as a technology.&amp;nbsp; Content owners are more comfortable making content available electronically, if they enforce their licensing policies.&amp;nbsp; Content comsumers get broader range of available content.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=446369" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>