<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>I can't believe we are still talking about whether saas == multi-tenancy...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gianpaolo/archive/2008/06/20/i-can-t-believe-we-are-still-talking-about-whether-saas-multi-tenancy.aspx</link><description>I was reading Why multi-tenancy matters and Many degrees of multi-tenancy today and honestly, I am still surprised that there is still a debate around whether multi-tenancy is a prerequisite for SaaS. Multi-tenancy is a provider view of things, if you</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: I can't believe we are still talking about whether saas == multi-tenancy...</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/gianpaolo/archive/2008/06/20/i-can-t-believe-we-are-still-talking-about-whether-saas-multi-tenancy.aspx#8639438</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:27:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8639438</guid><dc:creator>diathesis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Multi-tenancy can still affect the consumers of SaaS -- in particular, if the consumer is folding the service into their own multi-tenant offering, multi-tenancy can be critical. &amp;nbsp;But the secondary effects of multi-tenancy can still be significant -- like disruptive changes in an always-upgrade environment. &amp;nbsp;But fort those clients not using multitenancy directly, they would be better focusing on those effects, I agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>