<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Rewrite vs Migrate vs Reuse vs Replace</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/11/03/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace.aspx</link><description>“Upgrading Visual Basic 6.0 Applications to Visual Basic .NET and Visual Basic 2005” is a great resource for anyone looking at upgrading from VB6 to .NET. The guide was developed jointly by the Microsoft patterns &amp;amp; practices team and ArtinSoft . See</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Rewrite vs Migrate vs Reuse vs Replace | MS Tech News</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/11/03/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace.aspx#9033225</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:10:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9033225</guid><dc:creator>Rewrite vs Migrate vs Reuse vs Replace | MS Tech News</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://mstechnews.info/2008/11/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace/"&gt;http://mstechnews.info/2008/11/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>VB6 Applications – I’m taking a fresh look at this area on Goto100</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/11/03/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace.aspx#9033245</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 17:13:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9033245</guid><dc:creator>Eric and the .NET Framework</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Over on &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100&lt;/a&gt; I will be taking a fresh look over the next few weeks at the question&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Legacy transformation alternatives revisited</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/11/03/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace.aspx#9035611</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 01:50:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9035611</guid><dc:creator>Erick Nassar Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Today Eric Nelson covered the quasi-legendary legacy transformation options graph on his blog . Taking&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Functional Equivalence vs Application Advancement (and Vertical vs Horizontal)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/11/03/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace.aspx#9059484</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 12:10:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9059484</guid><dc:creator>Goto 100  - Development with Visual Basic</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;These are a couple of useful terms I’ve picked up from the ”Upgrading Visual Basic 6.0 Applications to&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Upgrading VB6 applications – a moment to reflect :-)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/11/03/rewrite-vs-migrate-vs-reuse-vs-replace.aspx#9120300</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:36:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9120300</guid><dc:creator>Goto 100  - Development with Visual Basic</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve now spent a bit of time with the book ”Upgrading Visual Basic 6.0 Applications to Visual Basic .NET&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>