<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Goto 100  - Development with Visual Basic : VB10</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/VB10/default.aspx</link><description>Tags: VB10</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Visual Basic Language Design Meeting on Channel 9</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/07/28/visual-basic-language-design-meeting-on-channel-9.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:39:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8785418</guid><dc:creator>Eric Nelson</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/comments/8785418.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8785418</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Beth Massi &lt;a title="I sat down with the VB Language design team" href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/funkyonex/Visual-Basic-Language-Design-Meeting/"&gt;sat down with the VB Language design team&lt;/a&gt; to “talk about their design process, favourite features, their thoughts on other languages, as well as what the Visual Basic language strategy really is”. Thanks Beth – very useful. Looking forward to many more.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;iframe src="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/funkyonex/417025/player/" frameborder="0" width="320" scrolling="no" height="325"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/funkyonex/Visual-Basic-Language-Design-Meeting/"&gt;Visual Basic Language Design Meeting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8785418" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/Visual+Basic+.NET/default.aspx">Visual Basic .NET</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/Visual+Basic+2008/default.aspx">Visual Basic 2008</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/VB10/default.aspx">VB10</category></item><item><title>Visual Basic Line Continuation Character (and more on VB10)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/07/14/visual-basic-line-continuation-character-and-more-on-vb10.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:33:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8731378</guid><dc:creator>Eric Nelson</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/comments/8731378.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8731378</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I previously posted about &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/07/04/amanda-silver-on-visual-basic-2008-and-the-future-of-vb.aspx"&gt;Amanda discussing the future of VB&lt;/a&gt; . One of the things Amanda talked about was the line continuation character. I just come across a &lt;a href="http://www.panopticoncentral.net/archive/2008/02/27/22910.aspx"&gt;little more detail&lt;/a&gt; from Feb 2008. This post is by Paul Vick who is the language architect for Visual Basic and hence has a bunch of &lt;a href="http://www.panopticoncentral.net/category/26.aspx"&gt;posts discussing VB10&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8731378" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/Visual+Basic+.NET/default.aspx">Visual Basic .NET</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/VB10/default.aspx">VB10</category></item><item><title>Amanda Silver on Visual Basic 2008 and the future of VB</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/2008/07/04/amanda-silver-on-visual-basic-2008-and-the-future-of-vb.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 12:35:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8688291</guid><dc:creator>Eric Nelson</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/comments/8688291.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/commentrss.aspx?PostID=8688291</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;Annoyingly I am on leave today and my wife has a long list for me that doesn't include 27mins to watch this video. &lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;strike&gt;P.S. I will update this post once I get a chance to watch it!&lt;/strike&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;Got to watch it today. Definitely worth a watch if VB is your thing - although don't expect any huge announcments. Quick summary&lt;/p&gt; &lt;ul&gt; &lt;li&gt;Amanda starts by talking about a session she did at TechEd - including how she demonstrated&amp;nbsp; "build your own LINQ" to explain LINQ and how the foundations were laid with changes in CLR 2.0 e.g. type inference (Option Infer)&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;6:00 mins in and the conversation moves on to talk about dynamic languages (think Python, Lisp etc) and the relation to VB. Edit and Continue comes up a lot&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;9:00 in and Edit and Continue and the challenges to add it in VS 2005 are discussed in lots of detail (Many teams - clr, debugger, languages, ide and 11 months of work") and yet limitations remain - can really only edit contents of a method, not types.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;12:00 and Amanda starts to discuss how ability to change types &lt;strong&gt;might&lt;/strong&gt; be implemented - using a new dynamic type that sits above normal clr types. Methods would be able to be added and removed etc.&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;15:00 Amanda explores how intellisense capabilities &lt;strong&gt;might&lt;/strong&gt; be increased during the debug experience&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;17:00 Discusses the problems of COM types&lt;/li&gt; &lt;li&gt;22:00 Amanda talks about a feature which was pulled from VS2008 but sounds extremely likely to be in the next release - getting rid of the line continuation character in many cases (which will make all of us coding LINQ very happy). XML Literals was the first example of a feature in VB that spanned lines.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;iframe src="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/409971/player/" frameborder="0" width="320" scrolling="no" height="325"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://channel9.msdn.com/posts/Dan/TechEd-Amanda-Silver/"&gt;TechEd Amanda Silver on Visual Basic 2008 and VB in the future&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8688291" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/Visual+Basic+.NET/default.aspx">Visual Basic .NET</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/Visual+Basic+2008/default.aspx">Visual Basic 2008</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/goto100/archive/tags/VB10/default.aspx">VB10</category></item></channel></rss>