<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>How I expanded my concept of the technical editing role</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/harrymiller/archive/2007/02/23/how-i-expanded-my-concept-of-the-technical-editing-role.aspx</link><description>I've been having a short discussion with Tom Johnson at I'd rather be writing about the new format of his podcast tech writer voices , and he asked about what I've been doing. My response got kind of long, and it's stuff I've been wanting to post here</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: How I expanded my concept of the technical editing role</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/harrymiller/archive/2007/02/23/how-i-expanded-my-concept-of-the-technical-editing-role.aspx#1754371</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 01:23:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1754371</guid><dc:creator>Tom Johnson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Harry,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interesting post. I never thought about having a personal brand as a technical writer. I can see that you've reflected a lot about this. Lately I've been looking for a more defined purpose with my blog and podcast. Maybe it's a brand that I'm looking for.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of course I agree that effective communication -- delivering information in a way the reader completely and quickly understands -- is a key part of technical communication. While I agree with that principle, my own personal brand or philosophy is a little different. Haven't figured that out yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tom&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: How I expanded my concept of the technical editing role</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/harrymiller/archive/2007/02/23/how-i-expanded-my-concept-of-the-technical-editing-role.aspx#1815342</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:22:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1815342</guid><dc:creator>John</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;i think writers and editors must understand the scarcity of reader time and effort, but i think that's always been true. recently i finished some work that came out pretty good. i leveraged hyperlinks to shoot off from the core story into deeper topics. is it a guidance win? not really sure. i'm somewhat reluctant to put my work against memes and popular culture, as our audiences differ. i'm also not sure what the difference between &amp;quot;gets it&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;really gets it&amp;quot; is. i guess i embrace the notion of great discoverability and structure, and appropriate depth, but what's new about this notion?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the docs for postgresql are excellent. whatever technique used to produce them = victory.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>